Omoda C9 SHS vs Hyundai IONIQ 5

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Hyundai IONIQ 5 Discontinued model
Omoda C9 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C9 SHS

C9 SHS AWD Plug-in Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 999,900 ex-showroom
⛽ 71.4 km/l
VS
Hyundai IONIQ 5 in South Africa

Hyundai IONIQ 5

72kWh AWD Executive Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Discontinued model
ZAR 1,068,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 225 kW 🔧 605 Nm
Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C9 SHS vs Hyundai IONIQ 5: the short answer

C9 SHS and IONIQ 5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C9 SHS: current from ZAR 999,900 · IONIQ 5: last listed from ZAR 859,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C9 SHS IONIQ 5
Maximum Power C9 SHSNot Officially Disclosed IONIQ 5225 kW
Maximum Torque C9 SHSNot Officially Disclosed IONIQ 5605 Nm
Engine Size C9 SHS1500 cc IONIQ 5Not Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy C9 SHS71.4 km/l IONIQ 5Not Applicable
Ground Clearance C9 SHS165 mm IONIQ 5160 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Hyundai IONIQ 5 72kWh AWD Executive

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C9 SHS

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

IONIQ 5

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C9 SHS

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

IONIQ 5

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C9 SHS IONIQ 5
Model Introduced Year 2025 2022
Generation Current South Africa C9 SHS range First generation Ioniq 5 on Hyundai's dedicated E-GMP electric platform; 800V fast charging architecture allows rapid 18-minute charge from 10-80% at suitable DC fast chargers
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Launched in SA in 2022; updates to battery specifications and charging capabilities followed; the car has been on Hyundai SA's EV flagship from launch
Facelift Launched Since 2025 2022
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status active Not confirmed
Segment SUV Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg Not Available 2190 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Not confirmed
Spec C9 SHS IONIQ 5
Length 4775 mm 4635 mm
Width 1920 mm 1890 mm
Height 1671 mm 1605 mm
Wheelbase 2800 mm 3000 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 165 mm 160 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 140 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 l 72.6 l
Boot/Cargo Space 660 l 527 l
Kerb Weight 2195 kg 2190 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2717 kg Not confirmed
Payload Capacity 522 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg Not confirmed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 1005 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 970 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1070 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 960 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This C9 SHS and IONIQ 5 comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C9 SHS 92 vs IONIQ 5 100.

Efficiency index: C9 SHS 96 vs IONIQ 5 90.

Safety-equipment index: C9 SHS 94 vs IONIQ 5 98.

Practicality index: C9 SHS 69 vs IONIQ 5 70.

Ownership-cover index: C9 SHS not separately scored vs IONIQ 5 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C9 SHS leads by 1 points

C9 SHS and IONIQ 5 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 87 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 55% source coverage
87
#1 Evidence leader

C9 SHS

55% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 96 Check Practicality 69
Performance 92
Efficiency 96
Safety 94
Practicality 69
Leads by 1 points
86
#2

IONIQ 5

75% source coverage 4 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Ownership 65
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 98
Practicality 70
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance IONIQ 5 +8 Efficiency C9 SHS +6 Safety IONIQ 5 +4 Practicality IONIQ 5 +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C9 SHS

Performance 92/100
Efficiency 96/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 69/100

IONIQ 5

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 70/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Omoda C9 SHS leads the specification evidence index with 87 pts vs 86 pts for IONIQ 5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C9 SHS leads. However, IONIQ 5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

C9 SHS vs IONIQ 5 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.