Omoda C7 vs Hyundai H-100 Tipper

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Omoda C7 in South Africa

Omoda C7

Luxury Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 539,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 145 kW 🔧 290 Nm ⛽ 13.3 km/l
VS
Hyundai H-100 Tipper in South Africa

Hyundai H-100 Tipper

2.6D Tipper Aircon 5MT Diesel Current
ZAR 455,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 58 kW 🔧 167 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C7 vs Hyundai H-100 Tipper: the short answer

C7 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H-100 Tipper remains close.

H-100 Tipper starts ZAR 108,400 cheaper C7 from ZAR 539,900 · H-100 Tipper from ZAR 431,500

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C7 H-100 Tipper
Maximum Power C7145 kW @ 5500 rpm H-100 Tipper58 kW
Maximum Torque C7290 Nm H-100 Tipper167 Nm
Engine Size C71600 cc H-100 Tipper2607 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C713.3 km/l H-100 Tipper10.2 km/l
Ground Clearance C7176 mm H-100 Tipper185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Omoda C7

Luxury

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Hyundai H-100 Tipper

2.6D Tipper Aircon 5MT

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C7

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

H-100 Tipper

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

C7

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

H-100 Tipper

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C7 H-100 Tipper
Model Introduced Year 2026 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current South Africa C7 range Current South African H-100 Tipper listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Single-cab tipper
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Pickup
Tare Mass Kg 1578 kg 1740 kg
Vehicle Type SUV Pickup
Body Type Cab - Pickup
Color Note - Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note - Mid grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec C7 H-100 Tipper
Length 4660 mm 4850 mm
Width 1875 mm 1740 mm
Height 1670 mm 2120 mm
Wheelbase 2720 mm 2640 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 176 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 176 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 65 l
Boot/Cargo Space 614 l -
Kerb Weight 1578 kg 1740 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2090 kg 3015 kg
Payload Capacity 512 kg 1275 kg
Towing Capacity 1250 kg 1200 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.6 m Not Officially Disclosed
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 960 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1090 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 750 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This C7 and H-100 Tipper comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C7 61 vs H-100 Tipper 34.

Efficiency index: C7 52 vs H-100 Tipper 46.

Safety-equipment index: C7 94 vs H-100 Tipper 94.

Practicality index: C7 67 vs H-100 Tipper 58.

Ownership-cover index: C7 not separately scored vs H-100 Tipper 65.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C7 leads by 10 points

C7 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while H-100 Tipper remains close.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 74% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

C7

74% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 61
Efficiency 52
Safety 94
Practicality 67
Leads by 10 points
59
#2

H-100 Tipper

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 46
Safety 94
Practicality 58
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C7 +27 Efficiency C7 +6 Safety Level Practicality C7 +9

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C7

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 67/100

H-100 Tipper

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 65/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Omoda C7 leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 59 pts for H-100 Tipper

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C7 leads. However, H-100 Tipper may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C7
C7
VS
FRIDAY REEV
FRIDAY REEV
C7 vs FRIDAY REEV →
C7
C7
VS
HR-V
HR-V
C7 vs HR-V →
C7
C7
VS
Destinator
Destinator
C7 vs Destinator →
C7
C7
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
C7 vs Scorpio-N →
C7
C7
VS
Duster
Duster
C7 vs Duster →
C7
C7
VS
T60 Double Cab
T60 Double Cab
C7 vs T60 Double Cab →
H-100 Tipper
H-100 Tipper
VS
FRIDAY REEV
FRIDAY REEV
H-100 Tipper vs FRIDAY REEV →
H-100 Tipper
H-100 Tipper
VS
HR-V
HR-V
H-100 Tipper vs HR-V →

C7 vs H-100 Tipper questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.