Omoda C5 SHS vs Lexus RZ

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Omoda C5 SHS in South Africa

Omoda C5 SHS

C5 SHS Hybrid 1-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 469,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 105 kW 🔧 215 Nm ⛽ 20.4 km/l
VS
Lexus RZ in South Africa

Lexus RZ

RZ 550e F SPORT Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 1,977,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 300 kW 🔧 269 Nm
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Omoda C5 SHS vs Lexus RZ: the short answer

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C5 SHS remains close.

C5 SHS starts ZAR 1,212,700 cheaper C5 SHS from ZAR 469,900 · RZ from ZAR 1,682,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C5 SHS RZ
Maximum Power C5 SHS105 kW @ 5200 rpm RZ300 kW
Maximum Torque C5 SHS215 Nm @ 2500-4000 rpm RZ268.6 Nm
Engine Size C5 SHS1500 cc RZNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy C5 SHS20.4 km/l RZNot Applicable
Ground Clearance C5 SHS145 mm RZ200 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

C5 SHS

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

RZ

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C5 SHS

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

RZ

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec C5 SHS RZ
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South Africa C5 SHS range Updated dedicated battery-electric Lexus RZ range launched locally in 2026
Facelift History Current South Africa version listed by official source 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026 South African range introduces RZ 500e, RZ 550e F SPORT and RZ 600e F SPORT Performance derivatives
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Luxury SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1546 kg 2145-2165 kg
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec C5 SHS RZ
Length 4400 mm 4805 mm
Width 1830 mm 1895 mm
Height 1590 mm 1635 mm
Wheelbase 2630 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 145 mm 200 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 51 l 0 l
Boot/Cargo Space 372 l 522 l
Kerb Weight 1546 kg 2180 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2052 kg 2640 kg
Payload Capacity 506 kg 460 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.1 m 5.6 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1013 mm
Rear Headroom 970 mm 1008 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1069 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 953 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C5 SHS and RZ comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C5 SHS 51 vs RZ 83.

Efficiency index: C5 SHS 82 vs RZ 90.

Safety-equipment index: C5 SHS 94 vs RZ 94.

Practicality index: C5 SHS 52 vs RZ 62.

Ownership-cover index: C5 SHS not separately scored vs RZ not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RZ leads by 13 points

RZ has a modest catalogue-index lead, while C5 SHS remains close.

Evidence leader 82 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 60% source coverage
82
#1 Evidence leader

RZ

60% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Practicality 62
Performance 83
Efficiency 90
Safety 94
Practicality 62
Leads by 13 points
69
#2

C5 SHS

72% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 82
Safety 94
Practicality 52
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RZ +32 Efficiency RZ +8 Safety Level Practicality RZ +10

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RZ

Performance 83/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 62/100

C5 SHS

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 82/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 52/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus RZ leads the specification evidence index with 82 pts vs 69 pts for C5 SHS

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RZ leads. However, C5 SHS may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
NX
NX
C5 SHS vs NX →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
X3
X3
C5 SHS vs X3 →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
ATTO 8
ATTO 8
C5 SHS vs ATTO 8 →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
GLC
GLC
C5 SHS vs GLC →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
SEALION 7
SEALION 7
C5 SHS vs SEALION 7 →
C5 SHS
C5 SHS
VS
Tank 500
Tank 500
C5 SHS vs Tank 500 →
RZ
RZ
VS
NX
NX
RZ vs NX →
RZ
RZ
VS
X3
X3
RZ vs X3 →

C5 SHS vs RZ questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.