Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76 in South Africa

Toyota Land Cruiser 76

4.0 V6 Station Wagon AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,065,300 ex-showroom
⚡ 202 kW 🔧 381 Nm ⛽ 13 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota C-HR vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76: the short answer

C-HR and Land Cruiser 76 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · Land Cruiser 76: current from ZAR 980,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-HR Land Cruiser 76
Maximum Power C-HR134 kW Land Cruiser 76202 kW
Maximum Torque C-HR190 Nm Land Cruiser 76381 Nm
Engine Size C-HR1987 cc Land Cruiser 763956 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C-HR19.2 km/l Land Cruiser 7613 km/l
Ground Clearance C-HR160 mm Land Cruiser 76230 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C-HR

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Land Cruiser 76

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Land Cruiser 76

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR Land Cruiser 76
Model Introduced Year 2023 1984
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA 70 Series – one of the world's longest-running vehicle nameplates
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 Continuous mechanical updates while retaining core body-on-frame design. Minor updates in 2007, 2014, 2021
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2021
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg 2100 kg
Vehicle Type 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Color Note Not confirmed White, Beige
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Top grade in the South Africa lineup
Spec C-HR Land Cruiser 76
Length 4390 mm 4890 mm
Width 1796 mm 1885 mm
Height 1550 mm 1970 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2730 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 230 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 87 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 909 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 2100 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg 3300 kg
Payload Capacity 430 kg 1200 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 8 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 1 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 6 m
Front Headroom 993 mm 993 mm
Rear Headroom 946 mm 954 mm
Front Legroom 1030 mm 1040 mm
Rear Legroom 881 mm 887 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-HR and Land Cruiser 76 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs Land Cruiser 76 77.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs Land Cruiser 76 49.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs Land Cruiser 76 50.

Practicality index: C-HR 57 vs Land Cruiser 76 98.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs Land Cruiser 76 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C-HR leads by 1 points

C-HR and Land Cruiser 76 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 91% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Leads by 1 points
66
#2

Land Cruiser 76

86% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Practicality 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 77
Efficiency 49
Safety 50
Practicality 98
Ownership 43
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Land Cruiser 76 +24 Efficiency C-HR +29 Safety C-HR +48 Practicality Land Cruiser 76 +41 Ownership Level

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

Land Cruiser 76

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 49/100
Safety 50/100
Practicality 98/100
Ownership 43/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota C-HR leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 66 pts for Land Cruiser 76

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C-HR leads. However, Land Cruiser 76 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
C-HR vs E5 Electric →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
C-HR vs ATTO 3 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
H6 GT
H6 GT
C-HR vs H6 GT →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Tank 300
Tank 300
C-HR vs Tank 300 →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
H6 PHEV
H6 PHEV
C-HR vs H6 PHEV →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
B40 Plus
B40 Plus
C-HR vs B40 Plus →
Land Cruiser 76
Land Cruiser 76
VS
E5 Electric
E5 Electric
Land Cruiser 76 vs E5 Electric →
Land Cruiser 76
Land Cruiser 76
VS
ATTO 3
ATTO 3
Land Cruiser 76 vs ATTO 3 →

C-HR vs Land Cruiser 76 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.