Toyota C-HR vs Suzuki Grand Vitara

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota C-HR Discontinued model
Toyota C-HR in South Africa

Toyota C-HR

2.0 HEV GR Sport CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 499,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 134 kW 🔧 190 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
VS
Suzuki Grand Vitara in South Africa

Suzuki Grand Vitara

1.5 Hybrid GLX AllGrip AT Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 542,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm ⛽ 17.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota C-HR vs Suzuki Grand Vitara: the short answer

C-HR and Grand Vitara are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context C-HR: last listed from ZAR 429,000 · Grand Vitara: current from ZAR 359,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification C-HR Grand Vitara
Maximum Power C-HR134 kW Grand Vitara76 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque C-HR190 Nm Grand Vitara137 Nm @ 4400 rpm
Engine Size C-HR1987 cc Grand Vitara1462 cc
Combined Fuel Economy C-HR19.2 km/l Grand Vitara17.9 km/l
Ground Clearance C-HR160 mm Grand Vitara210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

C-HR

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
  • Lower published ownership cover
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Grand Vitara

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
  • Stronger published ownership cover
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

C-HR

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Grand Vitara

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published warranty or service cover

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec C-HR Grand Vitara
Model Introduced Year 2023 2022
Generation Second generation on TNGA-C platform – hybrid-only in SA Third generation YHB-series Grand Vitara; shared platform with Toyota Urban Cruiser (a partnership-specific platform development); mild-hybrid system uses belt-integrated starter generator technology; all-new design and powertrain versus the previous generation
Facelift History All-new second generation launched in SA in 2023 Third-generation Grand Vitara launched in SA in 2022; previous second-generation model discontinued in SA in 2015; current generation is a complete redesign on a new platform shared with the Toyota Urban Cruiser
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2022
Facelift Version Ending 2024 Current
Body Style 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Model Year 2021 2026
Production Status discontinued active
Segment SUV SUV
Tare Mass Kg 1500 kg 1225 kg
Vehicle Type 5-door Crossover SUV SUV
Color Note Not confirmed Pearl Arctic White, Metallic Grandeur Grey, Metallic Midnight Blue, Premium Silver, Pearl Burning Red
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 1.5 Hybrid GLX AllGrip AT
Spec C-HR Grand Vitara
Length 4390 mm 4345 mm
Width 1796 mm 1795 mm
Height 1550 mm 1645 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 2600 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 160 mm 210 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 125 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 43 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 377 l 310 l
Kerb Weight 1500 kg 1225 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1930 kg 1680 kg
Payload Capacity 430 kg 530 kg
Towing Capacity 1600 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 1 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 993 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 946 mm 970 mm
Front Legroom 1030 mm 1060 mm
Rear Legroom 881 mm 935 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This C-HR and Grand Vitara comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: C-HR 53 vs Grand Vitara 34.

Efficiency index: C-HR 78 vs Grand Vitara 73.

Safety-equipment index: C-HR 98 vs Grand Vitara 88.

Practicality index: C-HR 57 vs Grand Vitara 62.

Ownership-cover index: C-HR 43 vs Grand Vitara 71.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

C-HR leads by 3 points

C-HR and Grand Vitara are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 91% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

C-HR

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 53
Efficiency 78
Safety 98
Practicality 57
Ownership 43
Leads by 3 points
64
#2

Grand Vitara

89% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 73
Safety 88
Practicality 62
Ownership 71
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance C-HR +19 Efficiency C-HR +5 Safety C-HR +10 Practicality Grand Vitara +5 Ownership Grand Vitara +28

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

C-HR

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 78/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 57/100
Ownership 43/100

Grand Vitara

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 73/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 62/100
Ownership 71/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota C-HR leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 64 pts for Grand Vitara

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, C-HR leads. However, Grand Vitara may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
C-HR vs Jolion Pro →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
C-HR vs ZS Pro →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Seltos
Seltos
C-HR vs Seltos →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
Tiggo 7 Pro
Tiggo 7 Pro
C-HR vs Tiggo 7 Pro →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
UNI-S
UNI-S
C-HR vs UNI-S →
C-HR
C-HRDiscontinued
VS
T-Cross
T-Cross
C-HR vs T-Cross →
Grand Vitara
Grand Vitara
VS
Jolion Pro
Jolion Pro
Grand Vitara vs Jolion Pro →
Grand Vitara
Grand Vitara
VS
ZS Pro
ZS Pro
Grand Vitara vs ZS Pro →

C-HR vs Grand Vitara questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.