Volkswagen Amarok vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Volkswagen Amarok in South Africa

Volkswagen Amarok

3.0 V6 TDI Double Cab Aventura 4Motion AT Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,252,200 ex-showroom
⚡ 125 kW 🔧 400 Nm ⛽ 12.8 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Amarok
Fuel Economy Tie
🛡 Safety Amarok
📦 Practicality NP300 Hardbody
🔑 Ownership Tie
NP300 Hardbody starts ZAR 593200 cheaper Amarok from ZAR 593,200 · NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Amarok NP300 Hardbody
Engine Power 125 98
Torque 400 304
Engine Size 1968 2488
Claimed Mileage 12.8 11.4
Ground Clearance 192 215
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Airbags 6 4
Kerb Weight 2095 1395
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Amarok

57
/ 100
+8
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

The Bottom Line

Amarok has a slight advantage, but NP300 Hardbody remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Amarok +3 pts
Efficiency Equal
Safety Amarok +6 pts
Practicality NP300 Hardbody +1 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Performance 13/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 7/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Amarok

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
Weak Spots
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Highway Driving

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
Best suited to: Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Amarok

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment

NP300 Hardbody

  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Amarok NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 192 215
Wheelbase 3097 2500
Length 5254 4875
Width 1944 1760
Height 1834 1655
Kerb Weight 2095 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 3150 2400
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space 0 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity 3500 2500
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Front Track Width 1550 1495
Rear Track Width 1540 1490
Turning Radius Available 5.8
Load Bed Length Available 1907
Load Bed Width Available 1454
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec Amarok NP300 Hardbody
Engine 2.0L TDI Turbo Diesel 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 1968 2488
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 125 98
Torque 400 304
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Twin Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 180 168
0-100 km/h 10.5 12.5
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 17.5:1
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Power @ RPM 150 3600 rpm
Torque @ RPM 400 1750-2500 rpm
Engine Position Available Front Longitudinal
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Volkswagen Amarok wins with 57 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Amarok emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Amarok edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Amarok 7 vs NP300 Hardbody 7. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Amarok 18, NP300 Hardbody 12. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Amarok 12, NP300 Hardbody 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Amarok 7, NP300 Hardbody 8. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Amarok 13, NP300 Hardbody 10. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Amarok edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Amarok scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Amarok and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amarok scores 13 vs 10.

Efficiency: Amarok scores 7 vs 7.

Safety: Amarok scores 18 vs 12.

Practicality: Amarok scores 7 vs 8.

Ownership: Amarok scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Amarok the advantage in this comparison.