Changan Alsvin vs Toyota Camry

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Toyota Camry Discontinued model
Changan Alsvin in South Africa

Changan Alsvin

1.5 AT CE Petrol 5-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 289,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 78 kW 🔧 145 Nm ⛽ 14.49 km/l
VS
Toyota Camry in South Africa

Toyota Camry

2.5 Hybrid XSE CVT Hybrid e-CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 749,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 221 Nm ⛽ 19.2 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Changan Alsvin vs Toyota Camry: the short answer

Camry has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Alsvin.

Recorded price context Alsvin: current from ZAR 249,900 · Camry: last listed from ZAR 659,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Alsvin Camry
Maximum Power Alsvin78 kW Camry160 kW @ 5700 rpm
Maximum Torque Alsvin145 Nm Camry221 Nm @ 3600 rpm
Engine Size Alsvin1500 cc Camry2487 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Alsvin14.49 km/l Camry19.2 km/l
Ground Clearance Alsvin150 mm Camry140 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Alsvin

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Camry

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Alsvin

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Camry

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Alsvin Camry
Model Introduced Year 2025 2019
Generation Current South African Alsvin generation launched with two locally named derivatives in 2025. Current generation Camry on TNGA platform
Facelift History No South African facelift has been announced since the current range entered local retail sale. Latest generation with hybrid technology
Facelift Launched Since Not Applicable 2021
Facelift Version Ending Not Applicable 2024
Body Style Sedan Sedan
Model Year 2026 2021
Production Status active discontinued
Segment Compact sedan Sedan
Vehicle Type Passenger car Sedan
Tare Mass Kg - 1575 kg
Spec Alsvin Camry
Length 4390 mm 4885 mm
Width 1725 mm 1840 mm
Height 1490 mm 1445 mm
Wheelbase 2535 mm 2825 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 150 mm 140 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space 390 l 493 l
Kerb Weight 1069 kg 1575 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1470 kg 2055 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 480 kg
Towing Capacity 705 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.8 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 986 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 941 mm
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1037 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 899 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Alsvin and Camry comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Alsvin 35 vs Camry 59.

Efficiency index: Alsvin 56 vs Camry 79.

Safety-equipment index: Alsvin 32 vs Camry 98.

Practicality index: Alsvin 54 vs Camry 61.

Ownership-cover index: Alsvin not separately scored vs Camry 43.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Camry leads by 26 points

Camry has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Alsvin.

Evidence leader 69 /100
Lead 26 points
Data 91% source coverage
69
#1 Evidence leader

Camry

91% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Ownership 43
Performance 59
Efficiency 79
Safety 98
Practicality 61
Ownership 43
Leads by 26 points
43
#2

Alsvin

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 56 Check Safety 32
Performance 35
Efficiency 56
Safety 32
Practicality 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Camry +24 Efficiency Camry +23 Safety Camry +66 Practicality Camry +7

Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Camry

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 79/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 61/100
Ownership 43/100

Alsvin

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 56/100
Safety 32/100
Practicality 54/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Camry leads the specification evidence index with 69 pts vs 43 pts for Alsvin

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Camry leads. However, Alsvin may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Alsvin vs Camry questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.