Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Nissan Qashqai

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan Qashqai Discontinued model
Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Nissan Qashqai in South Africa

Nissan Qashqai

1.3 Tekna CVT Petrol CVT Discontinued model
ZAR 545,000 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 270 Nm ⛽ 17 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Nissan Qashqai: the short answer

All-New CX-5 and Qashqai are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · Qashqai: last listed from ZAR 495,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 Qashqai
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm Qashqai110 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm Qashqai270 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc Qashqai1332 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l Qashqai17 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm Qashqai180 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Nissan Qashqai 1.3 Tekna CVT

Source type: Hagalu catalogue record

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Qashqai

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Qashqai

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec All-New CX-5 Qashqai
Model Introduced Year 2026 2007
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Not confirmed
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies Latest generation redesign improved styling and tech
Facelift Launched Since 2026 Not confirmed
Facelift Version Ending Current Not confirmed
Body Style SUV Not confirmed
Model Year 2026 Not confirmed
Production Status upcoming Not confirmed
Segment Medium SUV Not confirmed
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle Not confirmed
Tare Mass Kg - 1450 kg
Spec All-New CX-5 Qashqai
Length 4690 mm 4425 mm
Width 1860 mm 1835 mm
Height 1695 mm 1625 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2665 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 180 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm Not confirmed
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 504 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 1450 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 1980 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg Not confirmed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1800 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows Not confirmed
Doors 5 doors Not confirmed
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m Not confirmed
Front Headroom 1007 mm Not confirmed
Rear Headroom 1020 mm Not confirmed
Front Legroom 1058 mm Not confirmed
Rear Legroom 1012 mm Not confirmed

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and Qashqai comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs Qashqai 53.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs Qashqai 65.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs Qashqai 87.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs Qashqai 68.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs Qashqai 42.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

All-New CX-5 leads by 4 points

All-New CX-5 and Qashqai are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 68 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 82% source coverage
68
#1 Evidence leader

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Leads by 4 points
64
#2

Qashqai

87% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 87 Check Ownership 42
Performance 53
Efficiency 65
Safety 87
Practicality 68
Ownership 42
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Qashqai +1 Efficiency Qashqai +13 Safety All-New CX-5 +11 Practicality Qashqai +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

Qashqai

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 65/100
Safety 87/100
Practicality 68/100
Ownership 42/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mazda All-New CX-5 leads the specification evidence index with 68 pts vs 64 pts for Qashqai

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, All-New CX-5 leads. However, Qashqai may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs Qashqai questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.