Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Lexus GX

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Lexus GX in South Africa

Lexus GX

GX 550 Overtrail Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,856,600 ex-showroom
⚡ 260 kW 🔧 650 Nm ⛽ 8.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Lexus GX: the short answer

GX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while All-New CX-5 remains close.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · GX: current from ZAR 1,856,600

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 GX
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm GX260 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm GX650 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc GX3500 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l GX8.1 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm GX220 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

GX

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

GX

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec All-New CX-5 GX
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Third-generation Lexus GX 550 body-on-frame luxury SUV
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades
Facelift Launched Since 2026 All-new GX 550 launched in South Africa in 2025 with Overtrail and SE grades
Facelift Version Ending Current Current South African specification checked 2026-07-17
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status upcoming published
Segment Medium SUV Luxury SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle SUV
Tare Mass Kg - 2475-2515 kg
Spec All-New CX-5 GX
Length 4690 mm 5015 mm
Width 1860 mm 2000 mm
Height 1695 mm 1870 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2850 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 220 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l 80 l
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 1063 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 3110 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg -
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 3500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 6 m
Front Headroom 1007 mm -
Rear Headroom 1020 mm -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 1012 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and GX comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs GX 96.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs GX 34.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs GX 93.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs GX 88.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs GX not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

GX leads by 13 points

GX has a modest catalogue-index lead, while All-New CX-5 remains close.

Evidence leader 81 /100
Lead 13 points
Data 70% source coverage
81
#1 Evidence leader

GX

70% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 96 Check Efficiency 34
Performance 96
Efficiency 34
Safety 93
Practicality 88
Leads by 13 points
68
#2

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance GX +44 Efficiency All-New CX-5 +18 Safety All-New CX-5 +5 Practicality GX +22

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

GX

Performance 96/100
Efficiency 34/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 88/100

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Lexus GX leads the specification evidence index with 81 pts vs 68 pts for All-New CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, GX leads. However, All-New CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs GX questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.