Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV in South Africa

Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV

EQS 450 4MATIC Electric Current
ZAR 2,735,851 ex-showroom
⚡ 265 kW 🔧 800 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV: the short answer

Compare the available model information below. Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · EQS SUV: current from ZAR 2,735,851

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 EQS SUV
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm EQS SUV265 kW
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm EQS SUV800 Nm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc EQS SUV-
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l EQS SUV-
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm EQS SUV-

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec All-New CX-5 EQS SUV
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa -
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies -
Facelift Launched Since 2026 -
Facelift Version Ending Current -
Body Style SUV Suv
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status upcoming Current South African retail range
Segment Medium SUV -
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle -
Spec All-New CX-5 EQS SUV
Length 4690 mm -
Width 1860 mm -
Height 1695 mm -
Wheelbase 2815 mm -
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm -
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm -
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l -
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l -
Kerb Weight 1629 kg -
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg -
Payload Capacity 561 kg -
Towing Capacity 1500 kg -
Seating Capacity 5 seats -
Number of Rows 2 rows -
Doors 5 doors -
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m -
Front Headroom 1007 mm -
Rear Headroom 1020 mm -
Front Legroom 1058 mm -
Rear Legroom 1012 mm -

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and EQS SUV comparison brings together local model information and available derivatives for South Africa. Prices and specifications appear only where they have been recorded for this market.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Score Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

All-New CX-5 vs EQS SUV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.