Mazda All-New CX-5 vs LDV D90

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Mazda All-New CX-5 in South Africa

Mazda All-New CX-5

2.5 Active Edition Auto FWD Petrol 6-Speed Automatic Upcoming
ZAR 570,000 last listed
Upcoming in South Africa Confirmed launch information and specifications remain visible while final availability is pending.
⚡ 132 kW 🔧 240 Nm ⛽ 13.2 km/l
VS
LDV D90 in South Africa

LDV D90

D90 Flagship Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 899,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW 🔧 500 Nm ⛽ 10.99 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Mazda All-New CX-5 vs LDV D90: the short answer

D90 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while All-New CX-5 remains close.

Recorded price context All-New CX-5: announced from ZAR 570,000 · D90: current from ZAR 899,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification All-New CX-5 D90
Maximum Power All-New CX-5132 kW @ 6000 rpm D90160 kW @ 4000 rpm
Maximum Torque All-New CX-5240 Nm @ 4000 rpm D90500 Nm @ 1500-2400 rpm
Engine Size All-New CX-52488 cc D901996 cc
Combined Fuel Economy All-New CX-513.2 km/l D9010.99 km/l
Ground Clearance All-New CX-5205 mm D90210 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

All-New CX-5

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

D90

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

All-New CX-5

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

D90

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec All-New CX-5 D90
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation Third-generation Mazda CX-5 for South Africa Current South African D90 generation.
Facelift History All-new third-generation model; no facelift applies No later South African facelift is published.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2025
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Seven-seat large SUV
Model Year 2026 2025
Production Status upcoming active
Segment Medium SUV SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle SUV
Spec All-New CX-5 D90
Length 4690 mm 5046 mm
Width 1860 mm 2016 mm
Height 1695 mm 1876 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2950 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 205 mm 210 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 200 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 56 l Not Officially Disclosed
Boot/Cargo Space 466 l 343 l
Kerb Weight 1629 kg 2370 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2190 kg 3100 kg
Payload Capacity 561 kg 730 kg
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 3100 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.0 m 6.45 m
Front Headroom 1007 mm 1010 mm
Rear Headroom 1020 mm 990 mm
Front Legroom 1058 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 1012 mm 950 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This All-New CX-5 and D90 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: All-New CX-5 52 vs D90 82.

Efficiency index: All-New CX-5 52 vs D90 45.

Safety-equipment index: All-New CX-5 98 vs D90 93.

Practicality index: All-New CX-5 66 vs D90 78.

Ownership-cover index: All-New CX-5 not separately scored vs D90 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

D90 leads by 8 points

D90 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while All-New CX-5 remains close.

Evidence leader 76 /100
Lead 8 points
Data 68% source coverage
76
#1 Evidence leader

D90

68% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 45
Performance 82
Efficiency 45
Safety 93
Practicality 78
Leads by 8 points
68
#2

All-New CX-5

82% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 98 Check Performance 52
Performance 52
Efficiency 52
Safety 98
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance D90 +30 Efficiency All-New CX-5 +7 Safety All-New CX-5 +5 Practicality D90 +12

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

D90

Performance 82/100
Efficiency 45/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 78/100

All-New CX-5

Performance 52/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 98/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index LDV D90 leads the specification evidence index with 76 pts vs 68 pts for All-New CX-5

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, D90 leads. However, All-New CX-5 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

All-New CX-5 vs D90 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.