Dongfeng 06 vs Jetour T2 i-DM

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng 06 in South Africa

Dongfeng 06

06 E3 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 699,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 200 kW 🔧 340 Nm ⛽ 0 km/l
VS
Jetour T2 i-DM in South Africa

Jetour T2 i-DM

T2 i-DM Plug-in Hybrid 3-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 779,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 100 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ 76.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng 06 vs Jetour T2 i-DM: the short answer

06 and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

06 starts ZAR 180,000 cheaper 06 from ZAR 599,900 · T2 i-DM from ZAR 779,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 06 T2 i-DM
Maximum Power 06200 kW T2 i-DM100 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque 06340 Nm T2 i-DM220 Nm @ 2500 rpm
Engine Size 06Not Applicable T2 i-DM1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 060 km/l T2 i-DM76.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 060 mm T2 i-DM190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Dongfeng 06

06 E3

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Jetour T2 i-DM

T2 i-DM

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

06

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance

T2 i-DM

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

06

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures

T2 i-DM

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 06 T2 i-DM
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South African generation Current South African launch specification
Facelift History Current launch specification Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Electric crossover SUV SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 4038 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 2138 kg
Spec 06 T2 i-DM
Length 4670 mm 4785 mm
Width 1900 mm 2006 mm
Height 1617 mm 1875 mm
Wheelbase 2775 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 1880 kg 2138 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2330 kg 2438 kg
Payload Capacity 450 kg 300 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 970 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 980 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 810 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 06 and T2 i-DM comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 06 77 vs T2 i-DM 45.

Efficiency index: 06 90 vs T2 i-DM 98.

Safety-equipment index: 06 92 vs T2 i-DM 92.

Practicality index: 06 55 vs T2 i-DM 66.

Ownership-cover index: 06 not separately scored vs T2 i-DM not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

06 leads by 5 points

06 and T2 i-DM are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 78 /100
Lead 5 points
Data 64% source coverage
78
#1 Evidence leader

06

64% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Safety 92 Check Practicality 55
Performance 77
Efficiency 90
Safety 92
Practicality 55
Leads by 5 points
73
#2

T2 i-DM

66% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 98 Check Performance 45
Performance 45
Efficiency 98
Safety 92
Practicality 66
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 06 +32 Efficiency T2 i-DM +8 Safety Level Practicality T2 i-DM +11

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

06

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 55/100

T2 i-DM

Performance 45/100
Efficiency 98/100
Safety 92/100
Practicality 66/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Dongfeng 06 leads the specification evidence index with 78 pts vs 73 pts for T2 i-DM

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 06 leads. However, T2 i-DM may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

06
06
VS
Tiggo 9
Tiggo 9
06 vs Tiggo 9 →
06
06
VS
T1 i-DM
T1 i-DM
06 vs T1 i-DM →
06
06
VS
J7 SHS
J7 SHS
06 vs J7 SHS →
06
06
VS
CR-V
CR-V
06 vs CR-V →
06
06
VS
X-Trail
X-Trail
06 vs X-Trail →
06
06
VS
Fortuner
Fortuner
06 vs Fortuner →
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
VS
Tiggo 9
Tiggo 9
T2 i-DM vs Tiggo 9 →
T2 i-DM
T2 i-DM
VS
T1 i-DM
T1 i-DM
T2 i-DM vs T1 i-DM →

06 vs T2 i-DM questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.