Dongfeng 06 vs Mitsubishi Destinator

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng 06 in South Africa

Dongfeng 06

06 E3 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 579,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 230 Nm
VS
Mitsubishi Destinator in South Africa

Mitsubishi Destinator

Exceed 1.5T CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 569,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 120 kW 🔧 250 Nm ⛽ 13.9 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng 06 vs Mitsubishi Destinator: the short answer

06 and Destinator are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Destinator starts ZAR 9,010 cheaper 06 from ZAR 499,000 · Destinator from ZAR 489,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 06 Destinator
Maximum Power 06120 kW Destinator120 kW @ 5000 rpm
Maximum Torque 06230 Nm Destinator250 Nm @ 2500-4000 rpm
Engine Size 06Not Applicable Destinator1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 06Not Applicable Destinator13.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 06170 mm Destinator214 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

06

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Destinator

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

06

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Destinator

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 06 Destinator
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South African 06 generation First-generation Destinator
Facelift History Current South African launch version; no local facelift announced South African launch specification introduced in March 2026.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Current specification
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact Electric SUV Medium seven-seat SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger Vehicle Passenger vehicle
Spec 06 Destinator
Length 4306 mm 4680 mm
Width 1868 mm 1840 mm
Height 1645 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2815 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 214 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm 185 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 45 l
Boot/Cargo Space 500 l 152 l
Kerb Weight 500 kg 1500 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 500 kg 2090 kg
Payload Capacity 500 kg 590 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 0 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 7 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 3 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.4 m
Front Headroom 1010 mm 890 mm
Rear Headroom 980 mm 850 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1055 mm
Rear Legroom 920 mm 620 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 06 and Destinator comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 06 42 vs Destinator 50.

Efficiency index: 06 31 vs Destinator 54.

Safety-equipment index: 06 88 vs Destinator 73.

Practicality index: 06 60 vs Destinator 63.

Ownership-cover index: 06 not separately scored vs Destinator not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Destinator leads by 4 points

06 and Destinator are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 79% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Destinator

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 50
Performance 50
Efficiency 54
Safety 73
Practicality 63
Leads by 4 points
56
#2

06

83% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 88 Check Efficiency 31
Performance 42
Efficiency 31
Safety 88
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Destinator +8 Efficiency Destinator +23 Safety 06 +15 Practicality Destinator +3

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Destinator

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 63/100

06

Performance 42/100
Efficiency 31/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Mitsubishi Destinator leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 56 pts for 06

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Destinator leads. However, 06 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

06
06
VS
XUV700
XUV700
06 vs XUV700 →
06
06
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
06 vs Scorpio-N →
06
06
VS
Duster
Duster
06 vs Duster →
06
06
VS
HR-V
HR-V
06 vs HR-V →
06
06
VS
ALCAZAR
ALCAZAR
06 vs ALCAZAR →
06
06
VS
HS
HS
06 vs HS →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
XUV700
XUV700
Destinator vs XUV700 →
Destinator
Destinator
VS
Scorpio-N
Scorpio-N
Destinator vs Scorpio-N →

06 vs Destinator questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.