Dongfeng 007 vs Jetour T1

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Dongfeng 007 in South Africa

Dongfeng 007

007 E2 540 Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 899,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 400 kW 🔧 620 Nm ⛽ 0 km/l
VS
Jetour T1 in South Africa

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
ZAR 634,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 180 kW 🔧 375 Nm ⛽ 11.1 km/l
＋ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Dongfeng 007 vs Jetour T1: the short answer

007 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while T1 remains close.

T1 starts ZAR 185,000 cheaper 007 from ZAR 699,900 · T1 from ZAR 514,900

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 007 T1
Maximum Power 007400 kW T1180 kW @ 5500 rpm
Maximum Torque 007620 Nm T1375 Nm
Engine Size 007Not Applicable T11998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 0070 km/l T111.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 0070 mm T1190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Independent editorial assessment

Hagalu editorial ratings

When a variant is selected, its rating out of five applies only to that exact derivative; a model-range review is not inherited. Editorial ratings are separate from the Specification Evidence Index out of 100 and are not customer ratings.

Dongfeng 007

007 E2 540

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Jetour T1

Odyssey 2.0TD+7DCT 4WD

Hagalu editorial rating Not yet rated

No complete editorial rating is published for this exact variant. This is not a zero score.

How Hagalu rates cars

Not yet rated means a complete review is not published; it does not mean the vehicle scored zero. Read the rating methodology.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

007

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

T1

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

007

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

T1

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 007 T1
Model Introduced Year 2026 2026
Generation Current South African generation Current local listing
Facelift History Current launch specification Not listed by current South African source page.
Facelift Launched Since 2026 2026
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Sedan SUV
Model Year 2026 Current
Production Status Active Active
Segment Executive electric sedan SUV
Vehicle Type Sedan SUV
Gross Combined Mass Kg - 3808 kg
Tare Mass Kg - 1811 kg
Spec 007 T1
Length 4880 mm 4705 mm
Width 1895 mm 1967 mm
Height 1460 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase 2915 mm 2800 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 0 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 140 mm 190 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 0 l 70 l
Boot/Cargo Space 452 l 574 l
Kerb Weight 2100 kg 1811 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2550 kg 2208 kg
Payload Capacity 450 kg 375 kg
Towing Capacity 750 kg 1600 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.8 m 5.7 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm 1030 mm
Rear Headroom 950 mm 1010 mm
Front Legroom 1050 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 900 mm 930 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This 007 and T1 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 007 100 vs T1 77.

Efficiency index: 007 90 vs T1 44.

Safety-equipment index: 007 88 vs T1 93.

Practicality index: 007 53 vs T1 67.

Ownership-cover index: 007 not separately scored vs T1 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

007 leads by 11 points

007 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while T1 remains close.

Evidence leader 83 /100
Lead 11 points
Data 64% source coverage
83
#1 Evidence leader

007

64% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 100 Check Practicality 53
Performance 100
Efficiency 90
Safety 88
Practicality 53
Leads by 11 points
72
#2

T1

68% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 93 Check Efficiency 44
Performance 77
Efficiency 44
Safety 93
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 007 +23 Efficiency 007 +46 Safety T1 +5 Practicality T1 +14

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

007

Performance 100/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 88/100
Practicality 53/100

T1

Performance 77/100
Efficiency 44/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Dongfeng 007 leads the specification evidence index with 83 pts vs 72 pts for T1

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 007 leads. However, T1 may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Related comparisons

Continue with closely related South Africa models and comparable body styles.

007
007
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
007 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
007
007
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
007 vs E5 EM-i →
007
007
VS
Tiggo 7 PHEV
Tiggo 7 PHEV
007 vs Tiggo 7 PHEV →
007
007
VS
06
06
007 vs 06 →
007
007
VS
Corolla
Corolla
007 vs Corolla →
007
007
VS
H6
H6
007 vs H6 →
T1
T1
VS
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
Tiggo 8 Pro Max
T1 vs Tiggo 8 Pro Max →
T1
T1
VS
E5 EM-i
E5 EM-i
T1 vs E5 EM-i →

007 vs T1 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.