Hyundai Staria Wagon vs Ford Territory

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Staria Wagon in Uganda

Hyundai Staria Wagon

Staria 11-seater Wagon 2.2 Diesel AT 4x2 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 230,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 130 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.99 km/l
VS
Ford Territory in Uganda

Ford Territory

Ambiente 1.8 EcoBoost 7DCT Petrol 7-Speed DCT Current
UGX 260,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 138 kW 🔧 318 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Staria Wagon vs Ford Territory: the short answer

Staria Wagon and Territory are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Staria Wagon starts UGX 30,000,000 cheaper Staria Wagon from UGX 230,000,000 · Territory from UGX 260,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Staria Wagon Territory
Maximum Power Staria Wagon130 kW @ 3800 rpm Territory138 kW @ 5200 rpm
Maximum Torque Staria Wagon430 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm Territory318 Nm @ 1750-3000 rpm
Engine Size Staria Wagon2199 cc Territory1799 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Staria Wagon12.99 km/l TerritoryNot Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance Staria WagonNot Officially Disclosed Territory190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Staria Wagon

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Territory

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Staria Wagon

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Territory

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Staria Wagon Territory
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Current market generation Current market generation
Facelift History Current-generation specification Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style MPV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment People carrier Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger MPV Passenger SUV
Spec Staria Wagon Territory
Length 5253 mm 4630 mm
Width 1997 mm 1935 mm
Height 1990 mm 1706 mm
Wheelbase 3273 mm 2726 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 60 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 11 seats 2 seats
Number of Rows 4 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1064 mm 1000 mm
Rear Headroom 1087 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1027 mm 1030 mm
Rear Legroom 1025 mm 880 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Staria Wagon and Territory comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Staria Wagon 59 vs Territory 54.

Efficiency index: Staria Wagon 51 vs Territory 52.

Safety-equipment index: Staria Wagon 61 vs Territory 81.

Practicality index: Staria Wagon 69 vs Territory 40.

Ownership-cover index: Staria Wagon not separately scored vs Territory not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Staria Wagon leads by 4 points

Staria Wagon and Territory are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 4 points
Data 66% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Staria Wagon

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Practicality 69 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 61
Practicality 69
Leads by 4 points
57
#2

Territory

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 81 Check Practicality 40
Performance 54
Efficiency 52
Safety 81
Practicality 40
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Staria Wagon +5 Efficiency Territory +1 Safety Territory +20 Practicality Staria Wagon +29

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Staria Wagon

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 69/100

Territory

Performance 54/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 81/100
Practicality 40/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Staria Wagon leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 57 pts for Territory

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Staria Wagon leads. However, Territory may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Staria Wagon vs Territory questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.