Hyundai Santa Fe vs Hyundai Staria Wagon

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Santa Fe in Uganda

Hyundai Santa Fe

SANTA FE 2.5L Petrol 4x4 8AT GLS Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 210,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 143 kW 🔧 246 Nm ⛽ 11.76 km/l
VS
Hyundai Staria Wagon in Uganda

Hyundai Staria Wagon

Staria 11-seater Wagon 2.2 Diesel AT 4x2 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 230,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 130 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.99 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Santa Fe vs Hyundai Staria Wagon: the short answer

Santa Fe and Staria Wagon are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Santa Fe starts UGX 20,000,000 cheaper Santa Fe from UGX 210,000,000 · Staria Wagon from UGX 230,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Santa Fe Staria Wagon
Maximum Power Santa Fe142.7 kW @ 6100 rpm Staria Wagon130 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Santa Fe246 Nm @ 4000 rpm Staria Wagon430 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm
Engine Size Santa Fe2497 cc Staria Wagon2199 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Santa Fe11.76 km/l Staria Wagon12.99 km/l
Ground Clearance Santa Fe177 mm Staria WagonNot Officially Disclosed

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Santa Fe

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

Staria Wagon

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Santa Fe

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Staria Wagon

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Santa Fe Staria Wagon
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Current market generation Current market generation
Facelift History Current-generation specification Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV MPV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV People carrier
Vehicle Type Passenger SUV Passenger MPV
Spec Santa Fe Staria Wagon
Length 4830 mm 5253 mm
Width 1900 mm 1997 mm
Height 1770 mm 1990 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 3273 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 177 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 1970 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 11 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 4 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 1064 mm
Rear Headroom 1007 mm 1087 mm
Front Legroom 1052 mm 1027 mm
Rear Legroom 1075 mm 1025 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Santa Fe and Staria Wagon comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Santa Fe 56 vs Staria Wagon 59.

Efficiency index: Santa Fe 46 vs Staria Wagon 51.

Safety-equipment index: Santa Fe 63 vs Staria Wagon 61.

Practicality index: Santa Fe 70 vs Staria Wagon 69.

Ownership-cover index: Santa Fe not separately scored vs Staria Wagon not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Staria Wagon leads by 2 points

Santa Fe and Staria Wagon are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 61 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 66% source coverage
61
#1 Evidence leader

Staria Wagon

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Practicality 69 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 61
Practicality 69
Leads by 2 points
59
#2

Santa Fe

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 70 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 56
Efficiency 46
Safety 63
Practicality 70
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Staria Wagon +3 Efficiency Staria Wagon +5 Safety Santa Fe +2 Practicality Santa Fe +1

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Staria Wagon

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 69/100

Santa Fe

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 63/100
Practicality 70/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Staria Wagon leads the specification evidence index with 61 pts vs 59 pts for Santa Fe

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Staria Wagon leads. However, Santa Fe may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Santa Fe vs Staria Wagon questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.