Hyundai Palisade vs Hyundai Staria Wagon

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Palisade in Uganda

Hyundai Palisade

PALISADE 2.5L PETROL 4x4 8AT GLS Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 220,000,000 ex-showroom
🔧 422 Nm ⛽ 15.0 km/l
VS
Hyundai Staria Wagon in Uganda

Hyundai Staria Wagon

Staria 11-seater Wagon 2.2 Diesel AT 4x2 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 230,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 130 kW 🔧 430 Nm ⛽ 12.99 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Palisade vs Hyundai Staria Wagon: the short answer

Palisade and Staria Wagon are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Palisade starts UGX 10,000,000 cheaper Palisade from UGX 220,000,000 · Staria Wagon from UGX 230,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Palisade Staria Wagon
Maximum Power PalisadeNot Officially Disclosed Staria Wagon130 kW @ 3800 rpm
Maximum Torque Palisade422 Nm @ 1700-4000 rpm Staria Wagon430 Nm @ 1500-2500 rpm
Engine Size Palisade2497 cc Staria Wagon2199 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Palisade15.0 km/l Staria Wagon12.99 km/l
Ground Clearance Palisade187 mm Staria WagonNot Officially Disclosed

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Palisade

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Staria Wagon

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use

Which One's Right for You?

Palisade

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Staria Wagon

  • Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Palisade Staria Wagon
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Current market generation Current market generation
Facelift History Current-generation specification Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since 2023 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV MPV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV People carrier
Vehicle Type Passenger SUV Passenger MPV
Spec Palisade Staria Wagon
Length 5060 mm 5253 mm
Width 1980 mm 1997 mm
Height Not Officially Disclosed 1990 mm
Wheelbase 2970 mm 3273 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 187 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 l 75 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 8 seats 11 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 4 rows
Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.97 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1054 mm 1064 mm
Rear Headroom 1043 mm 1087 mm
Front Legroom 1052 mm 1027 mm
Rear Legroom 1092 mm 1025 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Palisade and Staria Wagon comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Palisade 75 vs Staria Wagon 59.

Efficiency index: Palisade 60 vs Staria Wagon 51.

Safety-equipment index: Palisade 61 vs Staria Wagon 61.

Practicality index: Palisade 71 vs Staria Wagon 69.

Ownership-cover index: Palisade not separately scored vs Staria Wagon not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Palisade leads by 6 points

Palisade and Staria Wagon are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 6 points
Data 60% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

Palisade

60% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 75 Check Efficiency 60
Performance 75
Efficiency 60
Safety 61
Practicality 71
Leads by 6 points
61
#2

Staria Wagon

66% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Practicality 69 Check Efficiency 51
Performance 59
Efficiency 51
Safety 61
Practicality 69
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Palisade +16 Efficiency Palisade +9 Safety Level Practicality Palisade +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Palisade

Performance 75/100
Efficiency 60/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 71/100

Staria Wagon

Performance 59/100
Efficiency 51/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 69/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Palisade leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 61 pts for Staria Wagon

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Palisade leads. However, Staria Wagon may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Palisade vs Staria Wagon questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.