Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Eeco vs Suzuki New Swift
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Eeco
EECO CARGO 2WD 5D 1197p MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 65,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 59 kW
🔧 104 Nm
⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Suzuki New Swift
SWIFT GL+ 5D 1197p CVT
Petrol
CVT
Current
UGX 68,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 112 Nm
⛽ 21.0 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Eeco vs Suzuki New Swift: the short answer
Eeco and New Swift are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Eeco starts UGX 3,000,000 cheaper
Eeco from UGX 65,000,000 · New Swift from UGX 68,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Eeco | New Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Eeco59 kW @ 6000 rpm | New Swift77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Eeco104 Nm @ 3000 rpm | New Swift111.7 Nm @ 4300 rpm |
| Engine Size | Eeco1197 cc | New Swift1197 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Eeco15.2 km/l | New Swift21.0 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Eeco160 mm | New Swift145 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Eeco
Strengths
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader
New Swift
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Which One's Right for You?
Eeco
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
New Swift
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Eeco | New Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Current Uganda-market generation |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Van | Hatchback |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Light commercial vehicle | Passenger vehicle |
| Vehicle Type | Light commercial vehicle | Passenger car |
| Spec | Eeco | New Swift |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3675 mm | 3860 mm |
| Width | 1475 mm | 1735 mm |
| Height | 1825 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2350 mm | 2450 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 160 mm | 145 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 l | 37 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 540 l | 265 l |
| Kerb Weight | 935 kg | 945 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1540 kg | 1375 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 500 kg | 400 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 1 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.5 m | 5.0 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | 1000 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Applicable | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | 1020 mm |
| Rear Legroom | Not Applicable | 860 mm |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Eeco and New Swift comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Eeco 28 vs New Swift 30.
Efficiency index: Eeco 61 vs New Swift 77.
Safety-equipment index: Eeco 36 vs New Swift 36.
Practicality index: Eeco 49 vs New Swift 46.
Ownership-cover index: Eeco not separately scored vs New Swift not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Eeco and New Swift image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Eeco
View 8 more Eeco images
Suzuki New Swift
View 8 more New Swift images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
New Swift leads by 3 points
Eeco and New Swift are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
45
/100
Lead
3
points
Data
78%
source coverage
45
#1
Evidence leader
New Swift
Performance
30
Efficiency
77
Safety
36
Practicality
46
Leads by 3 points
42
#2
Eeco
Performance
28
Efficiency
61
Safety
36
Practicality
49
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
New Swift +2
Efficiency
New Swift +16
Safety
Level
Practicality
Eeco +3
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
New Swift
Performance
30/100
Efficiency
77/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
46/100
Eeco
Performance
28/100
Efficiency
61/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
49/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, New Swift leads. However, Eeco may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Eeco vs New Swift questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.