Toyota Hiace GD vs Suzuki New Swift

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Hiace GD in Uganda

Toyota Hiace GD

2.8 GD 15-Seater 6MT Diesel 6-Speed Manual Current
UGX 225,000,000 ex-showroom
⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Suzuki New Swift in Uganda

Suzuki New Swift

SWIFT GL+ 5D 1197p CVT Petrol CVT Current
UGX 68,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 112 Nm ⛽ 21.0 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Hiace GD vs Suzuki New Swift: the short answer

Hiace GD has a modest catalogue-index lead, while New Swift remains close.

New Swift starts UGX 157,000,000 cheaper Hiace GD from UGX 225,000,000 · New Swift from UGX 68,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Hiace GD New Swift
Maximum Power Hiace GDNot Officially Disclosed New Swift77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Hiace GDNot Officially Disclosed New Swift111.7 Nm @ 4300 rpm
Engine Size Hiace GD2755 cc New Swift1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Hiace GD12.5 km/l New Swift21.0 km/l
Ground Clearance Hiace GD185 mm New Swift145 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Hiace GD

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

New Swift

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Hiace GD

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

New Swift

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Hiace GD New Swift
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Uganda 2.8-litre GD passenger-van family, distinct from the separately listed 2.5-litre Hiace variants. Public 14-seat and supplied 15-seat identities require separate build matching. Current Uganda-market generation
Facelift History No local facelift confirmed Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Passenger van Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Light commercial passenger vehicle Passenger vehicle
Vehicle Type Minibus Passenger car
Spec Hiace GD New Swift
Length 5915 mm 3860 mm
Width 1950 mm 1735 mm
Height 2280 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase 3860 mm 2450 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 185 mm 145 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 170 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 l 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space 1000 l 265 l
Kerb Weight 2350 kg 945 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3500 kg 1375 kg
Payload Capacity 1150 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 750 kg 400 kg
Seating Capacity 15 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed 2 rows
Doors Not Officially Disclosed 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 7.9 m 5.0 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1020 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 860 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Hiace GD and New Swift comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Hiace GD 43 vs New Swift 30.

Efficiency index: Hiace GD 54 vs New Swift 77.

Safety-equipment index: Hiace GD 44 vs New Swift 36.

Practicality index: Hiace GD 81 vs New Swift 46.

Ownership-cover index: Hiace GD not separately scored vs New Swift not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Hiace GD leads by 10 points

Hiace GD has a modest catalogue-index lead, while New Swift remains close.

Evidence leader 55 /100
Lead 10 points
Data 57% source coverage
55
#1 Evidence leader

Hiace GD

57% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 81 Check Performance 43
Performance 43
Efficiency 54
Safety 44
Practicality 81
Leads by 10 points
45
#2

New Swift

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 77 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 77
Safety 36
Practicality 46
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Hiace GD +13 Efficiency New Swift +23 Safety Hiace GD +8 Practicality Hiace GD +35

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Hiace GD

Performance 43/100
Efficiency 54/100
Safety 44/100
Practicality 81/100

New Swift

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 77/100
Safety 36/100
Practicality 46/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota Hiace GD leads the specification evidence index with 55 pts vs 45 pts for New Swift

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Hiace GD leads. However, New Swift may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Hiace GD vs New Swift questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.