Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Across vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Across
ACROSS GLX SUN ROOF 6AT MHV 2WD 1462cc
Petrol Mild Hybrid
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 126,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 137 Nm
⛽ 16.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
LC300 3.3D GR-S 10-AT
Diesel
10-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 703,600,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW
🔧 700 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Across vs Toyota Land Cruiser 300: the short answer
Land Cruiser 300 has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Across.
Across starts UGX 434,600,000 cheaper
Across from UGX 126,000,000 · Land Cruiser 300 from UGX 560,600,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Across | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Across77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Land Cruiser 300225 kW @ 4000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Across136.8 Nm | Land Cruiser 300700 Nm @ 1600-2600 rpm |
| Engine Size | Across1462 cc | Land Cruiser 3003346 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Across16.0 km/l | Land Cruiser 30012.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Across210 mm | Land Cruiser 300235 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Across
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Across
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Land Cruiser 300
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Across | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Uganda LC300 diesel GR-S with the F33A-FTV V6 and front/rear locking differential specification. |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Passenger vehicle | Large seven-seat ladder-frame SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger car | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Across | Land Cruiser 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4360 mm | 4985 mm |
| Width | 1795 mm | 1980 mm |
| Height | 1655 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2600 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 210 mm | 235 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 l | 80 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 373 l | 621 l |
| Kerb Weight | 1250 kg | 2620 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1710 kg | 3230 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 650 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1200 kg | 3500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.4 m | 5.9 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 860 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Across and Land Cruiser 300 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Across 32 vs Land Cruiser 300 88.
Efficiency index: Across 68 vs Land Cruiser 300 54.
Safety-equipment index: Across 38 vs Land Cruiser 300 96.
Practicality index: Across 61 vs Land Cruiser 300 92.
Ownership-cover index: Across not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 300 not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Across and Land Cruiser 300 image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Across
View 8 more Across images
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
View 8 more Land Cruiser 300 images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 300 leads by 36 points
Land Cruiser 300 has a large lead in Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index over Across.
Evidence leader
84
/100
Lead
36
points
Data
76%
source coverage
84
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88
Efficiency
54
Safety
96
Practicality
92
Leads by 36 points
48
#2
Across
Performance
32
Efficiency
68
Safety
38
Practicality
61
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 300 +56
Efficiency
Across +14
Safety
Land Cruiser 300 +58
Practicality
Land Cruiser 300 +31
Large difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
88/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
96/100
Practicality
92/100
Across
Performance
32/100
Efficiency
68/100
Safety
38/100
Practicality
61/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, Across may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Across vs Land Cruiser 300 questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.