Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota RAV4

A proper head-to-head in Tanzania — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Fronx in Tanzania

Suzuki Fronx

Fronx GLX 1.5 4AT Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
TZS 63,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm
VS
Toyota RAV4 in Tanzania

Toyota RAV4

RAV4 2.0 Petrol CVT AWD Petrol CVT Current
TZS 135,800,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 127 kW 🔧 203 Nm ⛽ 15.38 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota RAV4: the short answer

Compare the available model information below. Hagalu has withheld a ranked verdict because the selected vehicles do not yet meet the minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold.

Fronx starts TZS 72,800,000 cheaper Fronx from TZS 63,000,000 · RAV4 from TZS 135,800,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Fronx RAV4
Maximum Power Fronx77 kW RAV4127 kW
Maximum Torque Fronx138 Nm RAV4203 Nm
Engine Size Fronx1462 cc RAV41987 cc
Combined Fuel Economy FronxNot Officially Disclosed RAV415.38 km/l
Ground Clearance Fronx170 mm RAV4185 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Fronx RAV4
Model Introduced Year 2024 2019
Generation First-generation Fronx Fifth-generation RAV4 (XA50)
Facelift History Current first-generation version Current fifth-generation version
Facelift Launched Since 2024 2019
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style crossover suv
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Subcompact crossover SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Fronx RAV4
Length 3995 mm 4600 mm
Width 1765 mm 1855 mm
Height 1550 mm 1685 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 170 mm 185 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 1065 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1480 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Doors 5 doors Not Officially Disclosed
Minimum Turning Radius 4.8 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Fronx and RAV4 comparison brings together local model information and available derivatives for Tanzania. Prices and specifications appear only where they have been recorded for this market.

Hagalu has withheld an overall score because at least one selected vehicle does not yet have four comparable categories and 50% weighted source coverage. Missing catalogue evidence is not replaced with a neutral score or a guessed value.

Use the key-spec and full-spec tables to compare the fields that are confirmed. For a purchase decision, verify current availability, exact derivative equipment, finance, insurance and ownership cover with the relevant manufacturer or authorised retailer.

Specification Score Withheld

Hagalu does not turn missing specifications into neutral scores or guessed values.

Fail closed

Score withheld: fewer than four comparable categories or less than 50% weighted source coverage for at least one vehicle.

Use the verified key-spec and full-spec tables on this page. A ranked index will appear only after every selected vehicle has source-backed data in at least four categories and reaches 50% weighted coverage.

What the evidence means

No overall winner is declared because the selected vehicles do not yet meet Hagalu's minimum like-for-like source-coverage threshold. Compare the confirmed rows and verify the exact derivative before buying.

Fronx vs RAV4 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Tanzania on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.