Hyundai H-100 Deck vs Ford Ranger Raptor

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Hyundai H-100 Deck in South Africa

Hyundai H-100 Deck

2.6D Deck Aircon 5MT Diesel Current
ZAR 412,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 58 kW 🔧 167 Nm ⛽ 10.2 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger Raptor in South Africa

Ford Ranger Raptor

Raptor 3.0T V6 10AT 4x4 Petrol 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,299,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 292 kW 🔧 583 Nm ⛽ 8.7 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Ranger Raptor
Fuel Economy H-100 Deck
🛡 Safety Tie
📦 Practicality Ranger Raptor
🔑 Ownership Not enough comparable data
H-100 Deck starts ZAR 909,100 cheaper H-100 Deck from ZAR 389,900 · Ranger Raptor from ZAR 1,299,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec H-100 Deck Ranger Raptor
Maximum Power 58 kW 292 kW
Maximum Torque 167 Nm 583 Nm
Engine Size 2607 cc 2993 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 10.2 km/l 8.7 km/l
Ground Clearance 185 mm 272 mm
Boot / Load Bay - -
Airbags Airbags not listed in official Hyundai H100 safety specification 7
Kerb Weight 1665 kg 2432 kg
Seating Capacity 3 seats 5 seats
Warranty 5 4 years / 120 000 km

= leads in this spec

The Bottom Line

Ranger Raptor holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H-100 Deck.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Ranger Raptor +64 pts
Efficiency H-100 Deck +6 pts
Safety Equal
Practicality Ranger Raptor +18 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

H-100 Deck

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Catalogue-index leader

Ranger Raptor

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

H-100 Deck

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Ranger Raptor

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec H-100 Deck Ranger Raptor
Model Introduced Year Current local generation year not confirmed Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Current South African H-100 Deck listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data. Current South African Ranger Raptor listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Single-cab dropside Double Cab Pickup
Body Type Cab Pickup Pickup
Color Note Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering. Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Mid grade in the South Africa lineup Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status published active
Segment Pickup Performance Bakkie
Tare Mass Kg 1665 kg 2432 kg
Vehicle Type Pickup Pickup
Drivetrain Note - Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: Raptor 3.0T V6 10AT 4x4
Spec H-100 Deck Ranger Raptor
Length 4850 mm 5381 mm
Width 1740 mm 2028 mm
Height 1970 mm 1922 mm
Wheelbase 2640 mm 3270 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 185 mm 272 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 l 80 l
Kerb Weight 1665 kg 2432 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 3015 kg 3160 kg
Payload Capacity 1350 kg 728 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 2500 kg
Seating Capacity 3 seats 5 seats
Doors 2 doors 4 doors

Source-backed Catalogue Index

A transparent specification index shown only when every vehicle clears the minimum comparable-data threshold.

Weighted / 100
Catalogue-index readout

Ranger Raptor leads by 21 points

Ranger Raptor holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over H-100 Deck.

Index leader 80 /100
Lead 21 points
Data 62% source coverage
80
#1 Index leader

Ranger Raptor

62% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Performance 98 Check Efficiency 40
Performance 98
Efficiency 40
Safety 94
Practicality 76
Leads by 21 points
59
#2

H-100 Deck

78% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Performance 34
Performance 34
Efficiency 46
Safety 94
Practicality 58
Ownership 65
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Raptor +64 Efficiency H-100 Deck +6 Safety Level Practicality Ranger Raptor +18

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Catalogue-index leader

Ranger Raptor

Performance 98/100
Efficiency 40/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 76/100

H-100 Deck

Performance 34/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 58/100
Ownership 65/100

How to Read This Comparison

🏆 Ford Ranger Raptor leads the catalogue index with 80 pts vs 59 pts for H-100 Deck

In Hagalu's source-backed catalogue index, Ranger Raptor leads. However, H-100 Deck may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the exact South African derivatives on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.

Hagalu does not publish a guaranteed resale winner. Depreciation depends on age, mileage, condition, derivative, colour, supply and demand. Compare several current used-market listings and obtain trade-in valuations for equivalent examples before relying on a resale estimate.

Check the exact derivatives for drive type, ground clearance, tyres, approach and departure angles, wading depth and low-range gearing where officially disclosed. SUV styling or all-wheel drive alone does not prove that a vehicle is suitable for demanding off-road use.

Calculate each exact derivative using your monthly distance and a current fuel or electricity price, then add finance, insurance, scheduled service, tyres and licence costs. Hagalu does not claim a fixed monthly saving without those buyer-specific inputs.

It is worth more only when the exact price difference buys equipment, space, performance or ownership cover that matters to you. Compare like-for-like lifecycle states and derivatives; a current offer and a historical last-listed price are not directly equivalent.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

This H-100 Deck and Ranger Raptor comparison uses the exact South African derivatives selected above. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: H-100 Deck 34 vs Ranger Raptor 98.

Efficiency index: H-100 Deck 46 vs Ranger Raptor 40.

Safety-equipment index: H-100 Deck 94 vs Ranger Raptor 94.

Practicality index: H-100 Deck 58 vs Ranger Raptor 76.

Ownership-cover index: H-100 Deck 65 vs Ranger Raptor not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.