GWM Cannon vs Ford Ranger Platinum

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes a historical vehicle

Current, upcoming and historical vehicles can be compared side by side. Historical records keep their verified specifications, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

GWM Cannon Discontinued model
GWM Cannon in South Africa

GWM Cannon

2.0T Double Cab LX 4x4 Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Discontinued model
ZAR 634,900 last listed
Discontinued model Verified historical specifications remain visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
⚡ 110 kW 🔧 480 Nm ⛽ 9.8 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger Platinum in South Africa

Ford Ranger Platinum

3.0TD V6 Double Cab Platinum 10AT 4x4 Diesel 10-Speed Automatic Current
ZAR 1,179,500 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Ranger Platinum
Fuel Economy Ranger Platinum
🛡 Safety Cannon
📦 Practicality Ranger Platinum
🔑 Ownership Cannon
Recorded price context Cannon: last listed from ZAR 484,900 · Ranger Platinum: current from ZAR 1,179,500

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Cannon Ranger Platinum
Maximum Power 110 kW 184 kW @ 3250 rpm
Maximum Torque 480 Nm 600 Nm
Engine Size 1996 cc 2993 cc
Claimed Mileage 9.8 km/l 11.9 km/l
Ground Clearance 210 mm 237 mm
Boot / Load Bay Not confirmed -
Airbags 6 Dual front, front side, curtain and driver knee
Kerb Weight 2035 kg 2345 kg
Seating Capacity Not confirmed -
Warranty 5 Years / 100,000 km 4 years / 120 000 km

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Both Cannon and Ranger Platinum are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Ranger Platinum +30 pts
Efficiency Ranger Platinum +11 pts
Safety Cannon +38 pts
Practicality Ranger Platinum +4 pts
Ownership Cannon +11 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Cannon

Strengths
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: General Use

Ranger Platinum

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

Cannon

  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Ranger Platinum

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec Cannon Ranger Platinum
Model Introduced Year 2021 Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Cannon sold in South Africa is the first generation, derived from Great Wall's POER platform shared with the P Series but with bodywork, suspension calibration and cabin treatment positioned for the lifestyle segment rather than the work bakkie use case. Current South African Ranger Platinum listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Cannon received a mid-cycle update in 2023 that brought the 12.3-inch infotainment system to LS as standard, added wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto across the range, and revised front-bumper geometry to improve approach angle by 2 degrees. A 2025 specification update standardised the panoramic sunroof on the LX trim and added the 360-camera to LS spec. Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since 2025 Original current-generation version
Body Type Cab Double Cab Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Tare Mass Kg 2035 kg 2345 kg
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double Cab Pickup
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Double Cab Platinum 10AT 4x4
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Mid-size Bakkie
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Pickup
Spec Cannon Ranger Platinum
Drivetrain Layout Front Engine Rear Wheel Drive Four Wheel Drive
LSD Available No Not Applicable
Transfer Case Yes Confirmed 4WD derivative
Differential Lock Yes Not Applicable
Paddle Shifters No Not Applicable
Engine Position Front Longitudinal -
Gearbox 8-Speed Automatic 10-Speed Automatic
Final Drive Ratio 3.54 Not Applicable
Steering Turns Lock to Lock 16.5:1 -
Number of Gears 8 10
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gear Shift Indicator Yes Not Applicable
Drivetrain 4x4 AWD 4WD / AWD
4WD Engagement Electronic rotary dial Available
4WD Hi Range Yes Available
4WD Lo Range Yes Available where 4WD low range is fitted
Differential Type Front Open -
Differential Type Rear Open / Lockable -
Gearbox Type Automatic 10-Speed Automatic
Reverse Gear Warning Yes -
Transmission Speeds 8 10
Gear Shift Type Automatic 10-Speed Automatic
Clutch Type Not confirmed Not Applicable
4WD Selector Not confirmed Confirmed 4WD derivative
Automatic Shift Paddles Not confirmed Not Applicable
Drive Mode Selector Not confirmed 4WD/off-road drive mode support
Front Differential Lock Not confirmed Not Applicable
Low Range Ratio Not confirmed Not Applicable
Low Range Not confirmed Available where 4WD low range is fitted
Axle Layout Not confirmed 4x4
Rear Differential Lock Not confirmed Not Applicable

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Cannon leads by 0 points

Both Cannon and Ranger Platinum are extremely closely matched, making the final choice dependent on buyer preference.

Winner 70 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 94% confidence
70
#1 Winner

Cannon

94% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 41
Performance 61
Efficiency 41
Safety 94
Practicality 81
Ownership 65
Leads by 0 points
70
#2

Ranger Platinum

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 91 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 56
Practicality 85
Ownership 54
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Platinum +30 Efficiency Ranger Platinum +11 Safety Cannon +38 Practicality Ranger Platinum +4 Ownership Cannon +11

Very close match. Final decision depends on buyer preference.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Cannon

Performance 61/100
Efficiency 41/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 81/100
Ownership 65/100

Ranger Platinum

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 56/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 54/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 GWM Cannon wins with 70 pts vs 70 pts for Ranger Platinum

In structured scoring, Cannon emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Ranger Platinum may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Cannon edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Cannon 41 vs Ranger Platinum 52. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Cannon 94, Ranger Platinum 56. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Cannon 65, Ranger Platinum 54. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Cannon 81, Ranger Platinum 85. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Cannon 61, Ranger Platinum 91. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Cannon edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Cannon scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Cannon and Ranger Platinum in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Cannon scores 61 vs 91.

Efficiency: Cannon scores 41 vs 52.

Safety: Cannon scores 94 vs 56.

Practicality: Cannon scores 81 vs 85.

Ownership: Cannon scores 65 vs 54.

Final structured scoring gives Cannon the advantage in this comparison.