iCAUR 03T vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

iCAUR 03T in South Africa

iCAUR 03T

2WD Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
ZAR 639,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 135 kW 🔧 220 Nm ⛽ Not applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l
VS
Mitsubishi Outlander Sport in South Africa

Mitsubishi Outlander Sport

Exceed 1.5L CVT Petrol CVT Current
ZAR 499,990 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 141 Nm ⛽ 16.1 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

iCAUR 03T vs Mitsubishi Outlander Sport: the short answer

03T holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Outlander Sport.

Outlander Sport starts ZAR 189,910 cheaper 03T from ZAR 639,900 · Outlander Sport from ZAR 449,990

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification 03T Outlander Sport
Maximum Power 03T135 kW Outlander Sport77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque 03T220 Nm Outlander Sport141 Nm @ 4000 rpm
Engine Size 03TNot applicable — battery electric vehicle Outlander Sport1499 cc
Combined Fuel Economy 03TNot applicable — electric consumption measured in kWh/100 km km/l Outlander Sport16.1 km/l
Ground Clearance 03T190 mm Outlander Sport193 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

03T

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Outlander Sport

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

03T

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Outlander Sport

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec 03T Outlander Sport
Model Introduced Year 2026 2025
Generation South African May 2026 local specification sheet for the current 03T generation. First South African Outlander Sport generation, Mitsubishi Xforce architecture
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status Published active
Segment Electric SUV Compact SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger vehicle Passenger vehicle
Facelift History - Introduced locally in January 2025 and replaced ASX.
Facelift Launched Since - Current specification
Facelift Version Ending - Current
Spec 03T Outlander Sport
Length 4433 mm 4390 mm
Width 1916 mm 1810 mm
Height 1741 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase 2715 mm 2650 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 193 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 165 mm 195 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity Not applicable — battery electric vehicle 42 l
Boot/Cargo Space 450 L rear seats up; 1,238 L with rear seats folded; 40 L rear storage box 480 l
Kerb Weight 1600–1950 kg 1250 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 2173 kg 1730 kg
Payload Capacity 350–650 kg 480 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.9 m 5.2 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm 950 mm
Rear Headroom 990 mm 880 mm
Front Legroom 1060 mm 1050 mm
Rear Legroom 970 mm 370 mm
Towing Capacity - 0 kg

In depth: how these cars differ

This 03T and Outlander Sport comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for South Africa. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: 03T 51 vs Outlander Sport 30.

Efficiency index: 03T 99 vs Outlander Sport 62.

Safety-equipment index: 03T 93 vs Outlander Sport 73.

Practicality index: 03T 64 vs Outlander Sport 67.

Ownership-cover index: 03T not separately scored vs Outlander Sport not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

03T leads by 18 points

03T holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Outlander Sport.

Evidence leader 75 /100
Lead 18 points
Data 67% source coverage
75
#1 Evidence leader

03T

67% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 99 Check Performance 51
Performance 51
Efficiency 99
Safety 93
Practicality 64
Leads by 18 points
57
#2

Outlander Sport

79% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 73 Check Performance 30
Performance 30
Efficiency 62
Safety 73
Practicality 67
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance 03T +21 Efficiency 03T +37 Safety 03T +20 Practicality Outlander Sport +3

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

03T

Performance 51/100
Efficiency 99/100
Safety 93/100
Practicality 64/100

Outlander Sport

Performance 30/100
Efficiency 62/100
Safety 73/100
Practicality 67/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index iCAUR 03T leads the specification evidence index with 75 pts vs 57 pts for Outlander Sport

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, 03T leads. However, Outlander Sport may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

03T vs Outlander Sport questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in South Africa on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.