Source type: Ford Kenya
Ford Ranger vs Hyundai STARIA
A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
VS
Hyundai STARIA
STARIA 2.2D Automatic
Diesel
8-Speed Automatic
Current
KES 8,950,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 130 kW
🔧 431 Nm
Decision summary
Ford Ranger vs Hyundai STARIA: the short answer
Ranger and STARIA are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Ranger starts KES 2,200,000 cheaper
Ranger from KES 6,750,000 · STARIA from KES 8,950,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Ranger | STARIA |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Ranger154 kW | STARIA130 kW |
| Maximum Torque | Ranger405 Nm | STARIA431 Nm |
| Engine Size | Ranger1996 cc | STARIA2199 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | RangerNot Officially Disclosed | STARIANot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | Ranger235 mm | STARIA186 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Hyundai Kenya
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Ranger
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
STARIA
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
Ranger
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
STARIA
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Ranger | STARIA |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Generation | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift History | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Version Ending | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Body Style | Pickup | MPV |
| Model Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Segment | Kenya-market Pickup | Kenya-market MPV |
| Vehicle Type | Pickup | MPV |
| Spec | Ranger | STARIA |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5370 mm | 5253 mm |
| Width | 1918 mm | 1997 mm |
| Height | 1884 mm | 1990 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3270 mm | 3273 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 235 mm | 186 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 220 mm | 171 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 l | 75 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 1233 l | 831 l |
| Kerb Weight | 2205 kg | 2190 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 3230 kg | 2950 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 1025 kg | 760 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 kg | 2500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 6.35 m | 5.94 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Ranger and STARIA comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Ranger 74 vs STARIA 67.
Efficiency index: Ranger 48 vs STARIA 46.
Safety-equipment index: Ranger 94 vs STARIA 94.
Practicality index: Ranger 92 vs STARIA 79.
Ownership-cover index: Ranger not separately scored vs STARIA not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Ranger and STARIA image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Ford Ranger
View 8 more Ranger images
Hyundai STARIA
View 8 more STARIA images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Ranger leads by 6 points
Ranger and STARIA are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
79
/100
Lead
6
points
Data
68%
source coverage
79
#1
Evidence leader
Ranger
Performance
74
Efficiency
48
Safety
94
Practicality
92
Leads by 6 points
73
#2
STARIA
Performance
67
Efficiency
46
Safety
94
Practicality
79
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Ranger +7
Efficiency
Ranger +2
Safety
Level
Practicality
Ranger +13
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Ranger
Performance
74/100
Efficiency
48/100
Safety
94/100
Practicality
92/100
STARIA
Performance
67/100
Efficiency
46/100
Safety
94/100
Practicality
79/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ranger leads. However, STARIA may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Kenya models and comparable body styles.
Ranger vs STARIA questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.