Source type: Toyota Kenya
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Isuzu mu-X
A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
LC300 3.3D GX-R 10-AT
Diesel
10-Speed Automatic
Current
KES 25,450,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 225 kW
🔧 700 Nm
VS
Decision summary
Toyota Land Cruiser 300 vs Isuzu mu-X: the short answer
Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while mu-X remains close.
mu-X starts KES 16,460,000 cheaper
Land Cruiser 300 from KES 25,450,000 · mu-X from KES 8,990,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Land Cruiser 300 | mu-X |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Land Cruiser 300225 kW @ 4000 rpm | mu-X110 kW |
| Maximum Torque | Land Cruiser 300700 Nm @ 1600-2600 rpm | mu-X350 Nm @ 1800-2600 rpm |
| Engine Size | Land Cruiser 3003346 cc | mu-X1899 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Land Cruiser 300Not Officially Disclosed | mu-XNot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | Land Cruiser 300235 mm | mu-X235 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Isuzu East Africa official Kenya model specification
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
mu-X
Strengths
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Land Cruiser 300
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
mu-X
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Land Cruiser 300 | mu-X |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Generation | Not Officially Disclosed | Current Kenya-market Isuzu East Africa derivative |
| Facelift History | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Version Ending | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Body Style | Station wagon | SUV |
| Model Year | Not Officially Disclosed | 2026 |
| Production Status | Active | active |
| Segment | Kenya-market SUV | Seven-seat diesel SUV |
| Vehicle Type | SUV | SUV |
| Spec | Land Cruiser 300 | mu-X |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4950 mm | 4850 mm |
| Width | 2010 mm | 1870 mm |
| Height | 1960 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2850 mm | 2855 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 235 mm | 235 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 235 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 l | 80 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 175 l | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Kerb Weight | 2563.88 kg | 2061 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 3230 kg | 2800 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 666 kg | 739 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 kg | 2100 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.9 m | 11.4 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Land Cruiser 300 and mu-X comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Land Cruiser 300 98 vs mu-X 62.
Efficiency index: Land Cruiser 300 42 vs mu-X 38.
Safety-equipment index: Land Cruiser 300 90 vs mu-X 86.
Practicality index: Land Cruiser 300 74 vs mu-X 80.
Ownership-cover index: Land Cruiser 300 not separately scored vs mu-X not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Land Cruiser 300 and mu-X image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Toyota Land Cruiser 300
View 8 more Land Cruiser 300 images
Isuzu mu-X
View 8 more mu-X images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 300 leads by 11 points
Land Cruiser 300 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while mu-X remains close.
Evidence leader
79
/100
Lead
11
points
Data
61%
source coverage
79
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
98
Efficiency
42
Safety
90
Practicality
74
Leads by 11 points
68
#2
mu-X
Performance
62
Efficiency
38
Safety
86
Practicality
80
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 300 +36
Efficiency
Land Cruiser 300 +4
Safety
Land Cruiser 300 +4
Practicality
mu-X +6
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 300
Performance
98/100
Efficiency
42/100
Safety
90/100
Practicality
74/100
mu-X
Performance
62/100
Efficiency
38/100
Safety
86/100
Practicality
80/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 300 leads. However, mu-X may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Kenya models and comparable body styles.
Land Cruiser 300 vs mu-X questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.