Source type: Hyundai Kenya
Hyundai KONA EV vs Toyota Starlet Cross
A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai KONA EV
KONA EV Kenya specification
Electric
Single-Speed Reduction Gear
Current
KES 6,950,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW
🔧 395 Nm
VS
Decision summary
Hyundai KONA EV vs Toyota Starlet Cross: the short answer
KONA EV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Starlet Cross.
Starlet Cross starts KES 2,900,000 cheaper
KONA EV from KES 6,950,000 · Starlet Cross from KES 4,050,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | KONA EV | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | KONA EV150 kW | Starlet Cross77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | KONA EV395 Nm | Starlet Cross138 Nm |
| Engine Size | KONA EVNot Applicable | Starlet Cross1462 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | KONA EVNot Officially Disclosed | Starlet CrossNot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | KONA EV158 mm | Starlet Cross190 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Kenya
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
KONA EV
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Starlet Cross
Strengths
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
KONA EV
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Starlet Cross
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | KONA EV | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Generation | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift History | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Version Ending | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Model Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Segment | Kenya-market SUV | Kenya-market SUV |
| Vehicle Type | SUV | SUV |
| Spec | KONA EV | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4205 mm | 3995 mm |
| Width | 1800 mm | 1765 mm |
| Height | 1570 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2600 mm | 2520 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 158 mm | 190 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 143 mm | 170 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Not Applicable | 37 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 332 l | 1009 l |
| Kerb Weight | 1685 kg | 1010 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 2170 kg | 1480 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 485 kg | 470 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 300 kg | 1000 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.3 m | 4.8 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This KONA EV and Starlet Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: KONA EV 73 vs Starlet Cross 35.
Efficiency index: KONA EV 90 vs Starlet Cross 57.
Safety-equipment index: KONA EV 82 vs Starlet Cross 44.
Practicality index: KONA EV 49 vs Starlet Cross 68.
Ownership-cover index: KONA EV not separately scored vs Starlet Cross not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
KONA EV and Starlet Cross image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai KONA EV
View 8 more KONA EV images
Toyota Starlet Cross
View 8 more Starlet Cross images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
KONA EV leads by 23 points
KONA EV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Starlet Cross.
Evidence leader
73
/100
Lead
23
points
Data
56%
source coverage
73
#1
Evidence leader
KONA EV
Performance
73
Efficiency
90
Safety
82
Practicality
49
Leads by 23 points
50
#2
Starlet Cross
Performance
35
Efficiency
57
Safety
44
Practicality
68
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
KONA EV +38
Efficiency
KONA EV +33
Safety
KONA EV +38
Practicality
Starlet Cross +19
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
KONA EV
Performance
73/100
Efficiency
90/100
Safety
82/100
Practicality
49/100
Starlet Cross
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
57/100
Safety
44/100
Practicality
68/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, KONA EV leads. However, Starlet Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Kenya models and comparable body styles.
KONA EV vs Starlet Cross questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.