Suzuki Jimny 5 doors vs Hyundai KONA EV

A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Jimny 5 doors in Kenya

Suzuki Jimny 5 doors

JIMNY GL 4WD 5D 1462p MT Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
KES 4,150,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW 🔧 130 Nm
VS
Hyundai KONA EV in Kenya

Hyundai KONA EV

KONA EV Kenya specification Electric Single-Speed Reduction Gear Current
KES 6,950,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW 🔧 395 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Jimny 5 doors vs Hyundai KONA EV: the short answer

KONA EV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Jimny 5 doors.

Jimny 5 doors starts KES 2,800,000 cheaper Jimny 5 doors from KES 4,150,000 · KONA EV from KES 6,950,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Jimny 5 doors KONA EV
Maximum Power Jimny 5 doors75 kW @ 6000 rpm KONA EV150 kW
Maximum Torque Jimny 5 doors130 Nm @ 4000 rpm KONA EV395 Nm
Engine Size Jimny 5 doors1462 cc KONA EVNot Applicable
Combined Fuel Economy Jimny 5 doorsNot Officially Disclosed KONA EVNot Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance Jimny 5 doors210 mm KONA EV158 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Suzuki Jimny 5 doors JIMNY GL 4WD 5D 1462p MT

Source type: Suzuki Kenya

Evidence for Hyundai KONA EV KONA EV Kenya specification

Source type: Hyundai Kenya

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Jimny 5 doors

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

KONA EV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Jimny 5 doors

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

KONA EV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Jimny 5 doors KONA EV
Model Introduced Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Generation Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift History Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Launched Since Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Version Ending Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Production Status Active Active
Segment Kenya-market SUV Kenya-market SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Jimny 5 doors KONA EV
Length 3985 mm 4205 mm
Width 1645 mm 1800 mm
Height 1725 mm 1570 mm
Wheelbase 2590 mm 2600 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 158 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 195 mm 143 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l Not Applicable
Boot/Cargo Space 211 l 332 l
Kerb Weight 1195 kg 1685 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1545 kg 2170 kg
Payload Capacity 300 kg 485 kg
Towing Capacity 1300 kg 300 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.7 m 5.3 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Jimny 5 doors and KONA EV comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Jimny 5 doors 39 vs KONA EV 73.

Efficiency index: Jimny 5 doors 53 vs KONA EV 90.

Safety-equipment index: Jimny 5 doors 84 vs KONA EV 82.

Practicality index: Jimny 5 doors 48 vs KONA EV 49.

Ownership-cover index: Jimny 5 doors not separately scored vs KONA EV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

KONA EV leads by 17 points

KONA EV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Jimny 5 doors.

Evidence leader 73 /100
Lead 17 points
Data 56% source coverage
73
#1 Evidence leader

KONA EV

56% source coverage 3 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 90 Check Practicality 49
Performance 73
Efficiency 90
Safety 82
Practicality 49
Leads by 17 points
56
#2

Jimny 5 doors

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 53
Safety 84
Practicality 48
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance KONA EV +34 Efficiency KONA EV +37 Safety Jimny 5 doors +2 Practicality KONA EV +1

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

KONA EV

Performance 73/100
Efficiency 90/100
Safety 82/100
Practicality 49/100

Jimny 5 doors

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 48/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai KONA EV leads the specification evidence index with 73 pts vs 56 pts for Jimny 5 doors

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, KONA EV leads. However, Jimny 5 doors may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.

Jimny 5 doors vs KONA EV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.