Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota New RAV4

A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Grand Vitara in Kenya

Suzuki Grand Vitara

GRAND VITARA Kenya specification Petrol Current
KES 4,950,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 76 kW 🔧 137 Nm
VS
Toyota New RAV4 in Kenya

Toyota New RAV4

2.0 Petrol CVT Petrol CVT Current
KES 7,820,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 127 kW 🔧 203 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota New RAV4: the short answer

New RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.

Grand Vitara starts KES 2,870,000 cheaper Grand Vitara from KES 4,950,000 · New RAV4 from KES 7,820,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Grand Vitara New RAV4
Maximum Power Grand Vitara75.8 kW New RAV4127 kW
Maximum Torque Grand Vitara136.8 Nm New RAV4203 Nm
Engine Size Grand Vitara1462 cc New RAV41987 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Grand VitaraNot Officially Disclosed New RAV4Not Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance Grand Vitara210 mm New RAV4201 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Suzuki Grand Vitara GRAND VITARA Kenya specification

Source type: Suzuki Kenya

Evidence for Toyota New RAV4 2.0 Petrol CVT

Source type: Toyota Kenya

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Grand Vitara

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

New RAV4

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Grand Vitara

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

New RAV4

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Grand Vitara New RAV4
Model Introduced Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Generation Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift History Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Launched Since Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Version Ending Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Body Style SUV SUV
Model Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Production Status Active Active
Segment Kenya-market SUV Kenya-market SUV
Vehicle Type SUV SUV
Spec Grand Vitara New RAV4
Length 4345 mm 4600 mm
Width 1795 mm 1855 mm
Height 1645 mm 1675 mm
Wheelbase 2600 mm 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 201 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 195 mm 201 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 373 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 1250 kg 1735 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1720 kg 2115 kg
Payload Capacity 470 kg 390 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 800 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.4 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Grand Vitara and New RAV4 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Grand Vitara 29 vs New RAV4 53.

Efficiency index: Grand Vitara 59 vs New RAV4 50.

Safety-equipment index: Grand Vitara 82 vs New RAV4 94.

Practicality index: Grand Vitara 60 vs New RAV4 64.

Ownership-cover index: Grand Vitara not separately scored vs New RAV4 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

New RAV4 leads by 9 points

New RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.

Evidence leader 66 /100
Lead 9 points
Data 73% source coverage
66
#1 Evidence leader

New RAV4

73% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 94 Check Efficiency 50
Performance 53
Efficiency 50
Safety 94
Practicality 64
Leads by 9 points
57
#2

Grand Vitara

65% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 82 Check Performance 29
Performance 29
Efficiency 59
Safety 82
Practicality 60
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance New RAV4 +24 Efficiency Grand Vitara +9 Safety New RAV4 +12 Practicality New RAV4 +4

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

New RAV4

Performance 53/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 94/100
Practicality 64/100

Grand Vitara

Performance 29/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 82/100
Practicality 60/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota New RAV4 leads the specification evidence index with 66 pts vs 57 pts for Grand Vitara

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, New RAV4 leads. However, Grand Vitara may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.

Grand Vitara vs New RAV4 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.