Suzuki Baleno vs Suzuki Celerio

A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Baleno in Kenya

Suzuki Baleno

BALENO GL 5D 1462p AT SLDA 7 Petrol Current
KES 3,150,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm
VS
Suzuki Celerio in Kenya

Suzuki Celerio

CELERIO GL MT Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
KES 1,995,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 49 kW 🔧 89 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Baleno vs Suzuki Celerio: the short answer

Baleno and Celerio are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Celerio starts KES 1,000,000 cheaper Baleno from KES 2,850,000 · Celerio from KES 1,850,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Baleno Celerio
Maximum Power Baleno77 kW @ 6000 rpm Celerio49 kW
Maximum Torque Baleno138 Nm @ 4400 rpm Celerio89 Nm @ 3500 rpm
Engine Size Baleno1462 cc Celerio998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy BalenoNot Officially Disclosed CelerioNot Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance Baleno150 mm Celerio170 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Suzuki Baleno BALENO GL 5D 1462p AT SLDA 7

Source type: Suzuki Kenya

Evidence for Suzuki Celerio CELERIO GL MT

Source type: Suzuki Kenya

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Baleno

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Celerio

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Baleno

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Celerio

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Baleno Celerio
Model Introduced Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Generation Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift History Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Launched Since Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Version Ending Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Body Style Compacts Compacts
Model Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Production Status Active Active
Segment Kenya-market Hatchback Kenya-market Hatchback
Vehicle Type Hatchback Hatchback
Spec Baleno Celerio
Length 3990 mm 3695 mm
Width 1745 mm 1655 mm
Height 1500 mm 1555 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2435 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 150 mm 170 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 135 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 32 l
Boot/Cargo Space 318 l 295 l
Kerb Weight 985 kg 840 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1430 kg 1260 kg
Payload Capacity 445 kg 420 kg
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 400 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 4.7 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Baleno and Celerio comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Baleno 35 vs Celerio 26.

Efficiency index: Baleno 59 vs Celerio 77.

Safety-equipment index: Baleno 84 vs Celerio 82.

Practicality index: Baleno 51 vs Celerio 49.

Ownership-cover index: Baleno not separately scored vs Celerio not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Baleno leads by 0 points

Baleno and Celerio are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 57 /100
Lead 0 points
Data 69% source coverage
57
#1 Evidence leader

Baleno

69% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 84 Check Performance 35
Performance 35
Efficiency 59
Safety 84
Practicality 51
Leads by 0 points
57
#2

Celerio

68% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 82 Check Performance 26
Performance 26
Efficiency 77
Safety 82
Practicality 49
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Baleno +9 Efficiency Celerio +18 Safety Baleno +2 Practicality Baleno +2

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Baleno

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 59/100
Safety 84/100
Practicality 51/100

Celerio

Performance 26/100
Efficiency 77/100
Safety 82/100
Practicality 49/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki Baleno leads the specification evidence index with 57 pts vs 57 pts for Celerio

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Baleno leads. However, Celerio may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.

Baleno vs Celerio questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.