Source type: Suzuki Uganda local distributor/source record
Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Ford Ranger Raptor
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Grand Vitara
GRAND VITARA GLX 4WD 5D 1462p AT MILD HYBRID
Petrol Mild Hybrid
6-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 155,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Ford Ranger Raptor
Raptor 3.0 V6 EcoBoost 10AT 4WD
Petrol
10-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 305,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 292 kW
🔧 583 Nm
Decision summary
Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Ford Ranger Raptor: the short answer
Ranger Raptor has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.
Grand Vitara starts UGX 150,000,000 cheaper
Grand Vitara from UGX 155,000,000 · Ranger Raptor from UGX 305,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Grand Vitara | Ranger Raptor |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Grand Vitara77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Ranger Raptor292 kW @ 5650 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Grand Vitara138 Nm @ 4400 rpm | Ranger Raptor583 Nm @ 3500 rpm |
| Engine Size | Grand Vitara1462 cc | Ranger Raptor2956 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Grand Vitara17.5 km/l | Ranger RaptorNot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | Grand VitaraNot Officially Disclosed | Ranger RaptorNot Officially Disclosed |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Ford Uganda / Motorcare exact grade specifications
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Grand Vitara
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader
Ranger Raptor
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Which One's Right for You?
Grand Vitara
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Ranger Raptor
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Grand Vitara | Ranger Raptor |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Current market generation |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Suv | Pickup |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Passenger vehicle | Performance mid-size pickup |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Pickup |
| Spec | Grand Vitara | Ranger Raptor |
|---|---|---|
| Length | Not Officially Disclosed | 5381 mm |
| Width | Not Officially Disclosed | 2028 mm |
| Height | Not Officially Disclosed | 1922 mm |
| Wheelbase | Not Officially Disclosed | 3270 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 l | 80 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 373 l | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Kerb Weight | 500 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 500 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 1200 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.0 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | 1000 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | 1030 mm |
| Rear Legroom | 860 mm | 880 mm |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Grand Vitara and Ranger Raptor comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Grand Vitara 36 vs Ranger Raptor 86.
Efficiency index: Grand Vitara 72 vs Ranger Raptor 45.
Safety-equipment index: Grand Vitara 65 vs Ranger Raptor 84.
Practicality index: Grand Vitara 40 vs Ranger Raptor 32.
Ownership-cover index: Grand Vitara not separately scored vs Ranger Raptor not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Grand Vitara and Ranger Raptor image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Grand Vitara
View 8 more Grand Vitara images
Ford Ranger Raptor
View 8 more Ranger Raptor images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Ranger Raptor leads by 11 points
Ranger Raptor has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Grand Vitara remains close.
Evidence leader
63
/100
Lead
11
points
Data
64%
source coverage
63
#1
Evidence leader
Ranger Raptor
Performance
86
Efficiency
45
Safety
84
Practicality
32
Leads by 11 points
52
#2
Grand Vitara
Performance
36
Efficiency
72
Safety
65
Practicality
40
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Ranger Raptor +50
Efficiency
Grand Vitara +27
Safety
Ranger Raptor +19
Practicality
Grand Vitara +8
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Ranger Raptor
Performance
86/100
Efficiency
45/100
Safety
84/100
Practicality
32/100
Grand Vitara
Performance
36/100
Efficiency
72/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
40/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Ranger Raptor leads. However, Grand Vitara may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Grand Vitara vs Ranger Raptor questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.