Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota RAV4 HEV

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Grand Vitara in Uganda

Suzuki Grand Vitara

GRAND VITARA GLX 4WD 5D 1462p AT MILD HYBRID Petrol Mild Hybrid 6-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 155,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 17.5 km/l
VS
Toyota RAV4 HEV in Uganda

Toyota RAV4 HEV

2.5 Hybrid e-CVT AWD Hybrid e-CVT Current
UGX 245,000,000 ex-showroom
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Grand Vitara vs Toyota RAV4 HEV: the short answer

RAV4 HEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Grand Vitara.

Grand Vitara starts UGX 90,000,000 cheaper Grand Vitara from UGX 155,000,000 · RAV4 HEV from UGX 245,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Grand Vitara RAV4 HEV
Maximum Power Grand Vitara77 kW @ 6000 rpm RAV4 HEVNot Officially Disclosed
Maximum Torque Grand Vitara138 Nm @ 4400 rpm RAV4 HEVNot Officially Disclosed
Engine Size Grand Vitara1462 cc RAV4 HEV2487 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Grand Vitara17.5 km/l RAV4 HEV12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Grand VitaraNot Officially Disclosed RAV4 HEV190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Grand Vitara

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader

RAV4 HEV

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Grand Vitara

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use

RAV4 HEV

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Grand Vitara RAV4 HEV
Model Introduced Year 2023 2023
Generation Current Uganda-market generation Uganda RAV4 Hybrid Electric listing. Match the supplied model year, drivetrain and grade before applying generation-specific equipment or performance figures.
Facelift History Current-generation specification No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Suv SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Passenger vehicle Family SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger SUV Passenger SUV
Spec Grand Vitara RAV4 HEV
Length Not Officially Disclosed 4600 mm
Width Not Officially Disclosed 1855 mm
Height Not Officially Disclosed 1685 mm
Wheelbase Not Officially Disclosed 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) Not Officially Disclosed 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 150 mm 175 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space 373 l 580 l
Kerb Weight 500 kg 1755 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 500 kg 2230 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed 475 kg
Towing Capacity 1200 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.0 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1000 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1020 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 860 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Grand Vitara and RAV4 HEV comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Grand Vitara 36 vs RAV4 HEV 55.

Efficiency index: Grand Vitara 72 vs RAV4 HEV 57.

Safety-equipment index: Grand Vitara 65 vs RAV4 HEV 95.

Practicality index: Grand Vitara 40 vs RAV4 HEV 64.

Ownership-cover index: Grand Vitara not separately scored vs RAV4 HEV not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RAV4 HEV leads by 16 points

RAV4 HEV holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over Grand Vitara.

Evidence leader 68 /100
Lead 16 points
Data 57% source coverage
68
#1 Evidence leader

RAV4 HEV

57% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Performance 55
Performance 55
Efficiency 57
Safety 95
Practicality 64
Leads by 16 points
52
#2

Grand Vitara

73% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Efficiency 72 Check Performance 36
Performance 36
Efficiency 72
Safety 65
Practicality 40
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RAV4 HEV +19 Efficiency Grand Vitara +15 Safety RAV4 HEV +30 Practicality RAV4 HEV +24

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RAV4 HEV

Performance 55/100
Efficiency 57/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 64/100

Grand Vitara

Performance 36/100
Efficiency 72/100
Safety 65/100
Practicality 40/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota RAV4 HEV leads the specification evidence index with 68 pts vs 52 pts for Grand Vitara

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RAV4 HEV leads. However, Grand Vitara may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Grand Vitara vs RAV4 HEV questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.