Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Fronx vs Suzuki Super Carry
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Fronx
FRONX GL 2WD 5D 1462p 5MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 92,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 17.8 km/l
VS
Suzuki Super Carry
SUPER CARRY 2D 2WD 1197p 5MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 68,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 14.5 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Fronx vs Suzuki Super Carry: the short answer
Fronx has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Super Carry remains close.
Super Carry starts UGX 24,000,000 cheaper
Fronx from UGX 92,000,000 · Super Carry from UGX 68,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Fronx | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Fronx77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Super Carry77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Fronx138 Nm @ 4400 rpm | Super Carry138 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Engine Size | Fronx1462 cc | Super Carry1197 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Fronx17.8 km/l | Super Carry14.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Fronx170 mm | Super CarryNot Officially Disclosed |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Suzuki Uganda local distributor/source record
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Fronx
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Super Carry
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Which One's Right for You?
Fronx
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Super Carry
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Fronx | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Current Uganda-market generation |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | Pickup |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Passenger vehicle | Light commercial vehicle |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger car | Pickup |
| Spec | Fronx | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3995 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Width | 1765 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Height | 1550 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Wheelbase | 2520 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 170 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 l | 40 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 304 l | Not Applicable |
| Kerb Weight | 1010 kg | 500 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1480 kg | 500 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 750 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 600 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.8 m | 5.0 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | 1000 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Applicable |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | 1020 mm |
| Rear Legroom | 860 mm | Not Applicable |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Fronx and Super Carry comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Fronx 32 vs Super Carry 33.
Efficiency index: Fronx 68 vs Super Carry 59.
Safety-equipment index: Fronx 65 vs Super Carry 36.
Practicality index: Fronx 51 vs Super Carry 34.
Ownership-cover index: Fronx not separately scored vs Super Carry not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Fronx and Super Carry image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Fronx
View 8 more Fronx images
Suzuki Super Carry
View 8 more Super Carry images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Fronx leads by 14 points
Fronx has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Super Carry remains close.
Evidence leader
53
/100
Lead
14
points
Data
78%
source coverage
53
#1
Evidence leader
Fronx
Performance
32
Efficiency
68
Safety
65
Practicality
51
Leads by 14 points
39
#2
Super Carry
Performance
33
Efficiency
59
Safety
36
Practicality
34
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Super Carry +1
Efficiency
Fronx +9
Safety
Fronx +29
Practicality
Fronx +17
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Fronx
Performance
32/100
Efficiency
68/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
51/100
Super Carry
Performance
33/100
Efficiency
59/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
34/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Fronx leads. However, Super Carry may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Fronx vs Super Carry questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.