Source type: MAC Uganda / Isuzu East Africa
Isuzu F-Series vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Isuzu F-Series
FRR 33LR 4x2 Cab Chassis 6MT
Diesel
6-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 285,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 129 kW
🔧 461 Nm
⛽ 4.5 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
2.8L Diesel 8-AT Adventure
Diesel
8-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 420,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW
🔧 500 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Isuzu F-Series vs Toyota Land Cruiser Prado: the short answer
Land Cruiser Prado holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over F-Series.
F-Series starts UGX 88,800,000 cheaper
F-Series from UGX 285,000,000 · Land Cruiser Prado from UGX 373,800,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | F-Series | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | F-Series129 kW @ 2800 rpm | Land Cruiser Prado150 kW @ 3000-3400 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | F-Series461 Nm @ 1700 rpm | Land Cruiser Prado500 Nm @ 1600-2800 rpm |
| Engine Size | F-Series8226 cc | Land Cruiser Prado2755 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | F-Series4.5 km/l | Land Cruiser Prado12.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | F-Series195 mm | Land Cruiser Prado210 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
F-Series
Strengths
- Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
General Use
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser Prado
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
F-Series
- Buyers who prefer this derivative's confirmed specification mix
Land Cruiser Prado
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | F-Series | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Generation | F-Series truck chassis in MAC Uganda-linked September 2017 Isuzu East Africa specification brochure; confirm exact build and body on order | Uganda-listed Prado 250 Series Adventure with the 2.8-litre diesel and eight-speed automatic. |
| Facelift History | Current Uganda-listed generation; 2026 catalogue planning specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2024 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Cab Chassis | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Medium-duty commercial truck | Seven-seat ladder-frame SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Commercial truck chassis | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | F-Series | Land Cruiser Prado |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 8170 mm | 4920 mm |
| Width | 2200 mm | 1980 mm |
| Height | 2550 mm | 1950 mm |
| Wheelbase | 4850 mm | 2850 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 195 mm | 210 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 195 mm | 200 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 200 l | 110 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Applicable | 620 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 2495 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 9900 kg | 3100 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 3500 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 1 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 6.1 m | 6.0 m |
| Front Headroom | 1030 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Applicable | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Applicable | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This F-Series and Land Cruiser Prado comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: F-Series 58 vs Land Cruiser Prado 73.
Efficiency index: F-Series 26 vs Land Cruiser Prado 54.
Safety-equipment index: F-Series 89 vs Land Cruiser Prado 95.
Practicality index: F-Series 63 vs Land Cruiser Prado 82.
Ownership-cover index: F-Series not separately scored vs Land Cruiser Prado not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
F-Series and Land Cruiser Prado image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Isuzu F-Series
View 8 more F-Series images
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
View 8 more Land Cruiser Prado images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser Prado leads by 16 points
Land Cruiser Prado holds a noticeable catalogue-index lead over F-Series.
Evidence leader
77
/100
Lead
16
points
Data
71%
source coverage
77
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser Prado
Performance
73
Efficiency
54
Safety
95
Practicality
82
Leads by 16 points
61
#2
F-Series
Performance
58
Efficiency
26
Safety
89
Practicality
63
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser Prado +15
Efficiency
Land Cruiser Prado +28
Safety
Land Cruiser Prado +6
Practicality
Land Cruiser Prado +19
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser Prado
Performance
73/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
95/100
Practicality
82/100
F-Series
Performance
58/100
Efficiency
26/100
Safety
89/100
Practicality
63/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser Prado leads. However, F-Series may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
F-Series vs Land Cruiser Prado questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.