Source type: MAC Uganda / Isuzu
Isuzu D-Max vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Isuzu D-Max
1.9 Ddi Single Cab HR L 4x2 6MT
Diesel
6-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 145,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 110 kW
🔧 350 Nm
⛽ 14.08 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 79
LC79 4.2L Pick-up Double Cab 5-MT 4x4
Diesel
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 360,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW
🔧 285 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Isuzu D-Max vs Toyota Land Cruiser 79: the short answer
D-Max and Land Cruiser 79 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
D-Max starts UGX 215,000,000 cheaper
D-Max from UGX 145,000,000 · Land Cruiser 79 from UGX 360,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | D-Max | Land Cruiser 79 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | D-Max110 kW @ 3600 rpm | Land Cruiser 7996 kW @ 3800 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | D-Max350 Nm @ 1800-2600 rpm | Land Cruiser 79285 Nm @ 2200 rpm |
| Engine Size | D-Max1898 cc | Land Cruiser 794164 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | D-Max14.08 km/l | Land Cruiser 7912.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | D-Max227 mm | Land Cruiser 79235 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
D-Max
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 79
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
D-Max
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Land Cruiser 79
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | D-Max | Land Cruiser 79 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Generation | MAC Uganda Gen 7 catalogue; June 2022 derivative specification sheet | Uganda-listed 70 Series LC79 double cab with 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel and five-speed manual; not the later 2.8-litre automatic specification. |
| Facelift History | Current Uganda-listed generation; 2026 catalogue planning specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2024 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Pickup | Pick-up double cab |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Light commercial pickup | Heavy-duty double-cab pickup |
| Vehicle Type | Pickup | Pickup |
| Spec | D-Max | Land Cruiser 79 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 5325 mm | 5095 mm |
| Width | 1870 mm | 1790 mm |
| Height | 1780 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3125 mm | 3180 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 227 mm | 235 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 195 mm | 220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 l | 130 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 1000 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 2280 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 3000 kg | 3200 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 1225 kg | 1120 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 2100 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | Not Officially Disclosed | 2 rows |
| Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 6.25 m | 6.3 m |
| Front Headroom | 1005 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Applicable | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1050 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Applicable | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This D-Max and Land Cruiser 79 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: D-Max 48 vs Land Cruiser 79 51.
Efficiency index: D-Max 56 vs Land Cruiser 79 54.
Safety-equipment index: D-Max 50 vs Land Cruiser 79 44.
Practicality index: D-Max 64 vs Land Cruiser 79 82.
Ownership-cover index: D-Max not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 79 not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
D-Max and Land Cruiser 79 image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Isuzu D-Max
View 8 more D-Max images
Toyota Land Cruiser 79
View 8 more Land Cruiser 79 images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 79 leads by 4 points
D-Max and Land Cruiser 79 are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
58
/100
Lead
4
points
Data
74%
source coverage
58
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 79
Performance
51
Efficiency
54
Safety
44
Practicality
82
Leads by 4 points
54
#2
D-Max
Performance
48
Efficiency
56
Safety
50
Practicality
64
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 79 +3
Efficiency
D-Max +2
Safety
D-Max +6
Practicality
Land Cruiser 79 +18
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 79
Performance
51/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
44/100
Practicality
82/100
D-Max
Performance
48/100
Efficiency
56/100
Safety
50/100
Practicality
64/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 79 leads. However, D-Max may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
D-Max vs Land Cruiser 79 questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.