Source type: Hyundai Kenya
Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Hyundai KONA EV
A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
72.6 kWh Long RWD
Electric
Single-Speed Reduction Gear
Current
KES 9,250,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 160 kW
🔧 350 Nm
VS
Hyundai KONA EV
KONA EV Kenya specification
Electric
Single-Speed Reduction Gear
Current
KES 6,950,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 150 kW
🔧 395 Nm
Decision summary
Hyundai IONIQ 5 vs Hyundai KONA EV: the short answer
IONIQ 5 and KONA EV are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
KONA EV starts KES 1,300,000 cheaper
IONIQ 5 from KES 8,250,000 · KONA EV from KES 6,950,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | IONIQ 5 | KONA EV |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | IONIQ 5160 kW | KONA EV150 kW |
| Maximum Torque | IONIQ 5350 Nm | KONA EV395 Nm |
| Engine Size | IONIQ 5Not Applicable | KONA EVNot Applicable |
| Combined Fuel Economy | IONIQ 5Not Officially Disclosed | KONA EVNot Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance | IONIQ 5160 mm | KONA EV158 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Hyundai Kenya
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
IONIQ 5
Strengths
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to:
Published Practicality
KONA EV
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Which One's Right for You?
IONIQ 5
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
KONA EV
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | IONIQ 5 | KONA EV |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Generation | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift History | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Launched Since | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Facelift Version Ending | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Body Style | SUV | SUV |
| Model Year | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Production Status | Active | Active |
| Segment | Kenya-market SUV | Kenya-market SUV |
| Vehicle Type | SUV | SUV |
| Spec | IONIQ 5 | KONA EV |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4635 mm | 4205 mm |
| Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
| Height | 1605 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3000 mm | 2600 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 160 mm | 158 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 145 mm | 143 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 527 l | 332 l |
| Kerb Weight | 1905 kg | 1685 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 2430 kg | 2170 kg |
| Payload Capacity | 525 kg | 485 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 1600 kg | 300 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.99 m | 5.3 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This IONIQ 5 and KONA EV comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: IONIQ 5 67 vs KONA EV 73.
Efficiency index: IONIQ 5 90 vs KONA EV 90.
Safety-equipment index: IONIQ 5 94 vs KONA EV 82.
Practicality index: IONIQ 5 65 vs KONA EV 49.
Ownership-cover index: IONIQ 5 not separately scored vs KONA EV not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
IONIQ 5 and KONA EV image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai IONIQ 5
View 8 more IONIQ 5 images
Hyundai KONA EV
View 8 more KONA EV images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
IONIQ 5 leads by 5 points
IONIQ 5 and KONA EV are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
78
/100
Lead
5
points
Data
56%
source coverage
78
#1
Evidence leader
IONIQ 5
Performance
67
Efficiency
90
Safety
94
Practicality
65
Leads by 5 points
73
#2
KONA EV
Performance
73
Efficiency
90
Safety
82
Practicality
49
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
KONA EV +6
Efficiency
Level
Safety
IONIQ 5 +12
Practicality
IONIQ 5 +16
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
IONIQ 5
Performance
67/100
Efficiency
90/100
Safety
94/100
Practicality
65/100
KONA EV
Performance
73/100
Efficiency
90/100
Safety
82/100
Practicality
49/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, IONIQ 5 leads. However, KONA EV may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Kenya models and comparable body styles.
IONIQ 5 vs KONA EV questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.