Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota Starlet Cross

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Hyundai Santa Fe in Uganda

Hyundai Santa Fe

SANTA FE 2.5L Petrol 4x4 8AT GLS Petrol 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 210,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 143 kW 🔧 246 Nm ⛽ 11.76 km/l
VS
Toyota Starlet Cross in Uganda

Toyota Starlet Cross

1.5L Petrol AT DELUXE Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 116,900,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Hyundai Santa Fe vs Toyota Starlet Cross: the short answer

Santa Fe and Starlet Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Starlet Cross starts UGX 110,900,000 cheaper Santa Fe from UGX 210,000,000 · Starlet Cross from UGX 99,100,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Santa Fe Starlet Cross
Maximum Power Santa Fe142.7 kW @ 6100 rpm Starlet Cross77 kW @ 6000 rpm
Maximum Torque Santa Fe246 Nm @ 4000 rpm Starlet Cross138 Nm @ 4400 rpm
Engine Size Santa Fe2497 cc Starlet Cross1462 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Santa Fe11.76 km/l Starlet Cross12.5 km/l
Ground Clearance Santa Fe177 mm Starlet Cross190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Specification evidence leader

Santa Fe

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Practicality

Starlet Cross

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Santa Fe

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Starlet Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Santa Fe Starlet Cross
Model Introduced Year 2023 2024
Generation Current market generation Current Uganda listing; local generation dates are not stated.
Facelift History Current-generation specification No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since 2023 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style SUV Hatchback
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment SUV Compact crossover
Vehicle Type Passenger SUV Passenger crossover
Spec Santa Fe Starlet Cross
Length 4830 mm 3995 mm
Width 1900 mm 1765 mm
Height 1770 mm 1550 mm
Wheelbase 2815 mm 2520 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 177 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 160 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 67 l 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Officially Disclosed 304 l
Kerb Weight 1970 kg 1010 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) Not Officially Disclosed 1480 kg
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1500 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 3 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 5.5 m 4.8 m
Front Headroom 1020 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom 1007 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1052 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom 1075 mm Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Santa Fe and Starlet Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Santa Fe 56 vs Starlet Cross 35.

Efficiency index: Santa Fe 46 vs Starlet Cross 52.

Safety-equipment index: Santa Fe 63 vs Starlet Cross 85.

Practicality index: Santa Fe 70 vs Starlet Cross 55.

Ownership-cover index: Santa Fe not separately scored vs Starlet Cross not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Santa Fe leads by 2 points

Santa Fe and Starlet Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 59 /100
Lead 2 points
Data 71% source coverage
59
#1 Evidence leader

Santa Fe

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Practicality 70 Check Efficiency 46
Performance 56
Efficiency 46
Safety 63
Practicality 70
Leads by 2 points
57
#2

Starlet Cross

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 85 Check Performance 35
Performance 35
Efficiency 52
Safety 85
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Santa Fe +21 Efficiency Starlet Cross +6 Safety Starlet Cross +22 Practicality Santa Fe +15

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Santa Fe

Performance 56/100
Efficiency 46/100
Safety 63/100
Practicality 70/100

Starlet Cross

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 85/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Santa Fe leads the specification evidence index with 59 pts vs 57 pts for Starlet Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Santa Fe leads. However, Starlet Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Santa Fe vs Starlet Cross questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.