Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota Starlet
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Fronx
FRONX GL 2WD 5D 1462p 5MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 92,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 17.8 km/l
VS
Toyota Starlet
1.5L Petrol AT DELUXE
Petrol
4-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 98,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Fronx vs Toyota Starlet: the short answer
Fronx and Starlet are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Fronx starts UGX 6,000,000 cheaper
Fronx from UGX 92,000,000 · Starlet from UGX 98,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Fronx | Starlet |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Fronx77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Starlet77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Fronx138 Nm @ 4400 rpm | Starlet138 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Engine Size | Fronx1462 cc | Starlet1462 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Fronx17.8 km/l | Starlet12.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Fronx170 mm | Starlet150 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Fronx
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader
Starlet
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Which One's Right for You?
Fronx
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Starlet
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Fronx | Starlet |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2022 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | 1.5-litre Starlet revision introduced to Uganda in June 2023 |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Uganda nameplate launch in February 2022; 1.5-litre engine and revised body introduced in June 2023 |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2023-on Uganda 1.5-litre range |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Passenger vehicle | Compact hatchback |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger car | Passenger car |
| Spec | Fronx | Starlet |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3995 mm | 3990 mm |
| Width | 1765 mm | 1745 mm |
| Height | 1550 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2520 mm | 2520 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 170 mm | 150 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 37 l | 37 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 304 l | 314 l |
| Kerb Weight | 1010 kg | 990 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1480 kg | 1430 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 440 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 600 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.8 m | 5.1 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 860 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Fronx and Starlet comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Fronx 32 vs Starlet 35.
Efficiency index: Fronx 68 vs Starlet 52.
Safety-equipment index: Fronx 65 vs Starlet 85.
Practicality index: Fronx 51 vs Starlet 50.
Ownership-cover index: Fronx not separately scored vs Starlet not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Fronx and Starlet image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Fronx
View 8 more Fronx images
Toyota Starlet
View 8 more Starlet images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Starlet leads by 2 points
Fronx and Starlet are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
55
/100
Lead
2
points
Data
74%
source coverage
55
#1
Evidence leader
Starlet
Performance
35
Efficiency
52
Safety
85
Practicality
50
Leads by 2 points
53
#2
Fronx
Performance
32
Efficiency
68
Safety
65
Practicality
51
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Starlet +3
Efficiency
Fronx +16
Safety
Starlet +20
Practicality
Fronx +1
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Starlet
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
85/100
Practicality
50/100
Fronx
Performance
32/100
Efficiency
68/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
51/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Starlet leads. However, Fronx may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Fronx vs Starlet questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.