Source type: Suzuki Uganda / CFAO Mobility
Suzuki Eeco vs Suzuki Super Carry
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Suzuki Eeco
EECO CARGO 2WD 5D 1197p MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 65,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 59 kW
🔧 104 Nm
⛽ 15.2 km/l
VS
Suzuki Super Carry
SUPER CARRY 2D 2WD 1197p 5MT
Petrol
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 68,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 14.5 km/l
Decision summary
Suzuki Eeco vs Suzuki Super Carry: the short answer
Eeco and Super Carry are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Eeco starts UGX 3,000,000 cheaper
Eeco from UGX 65,000,000 · Super Carry from UGX 68,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Eeco | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Eeco59 kW @ 6000 rpm | Super Carry77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Eeco104 Nm @ 3000 rpm | Super Carry138 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Engine Size | Eeco1197 cc | Super Carry1197 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Eeco15.2 km/l | Super Carry14.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Eeco160 mm | Super CarryNot Officially Disclosed |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Suzuki Uganda local distributor/source record
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Specification evidence leader
Eeco
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Published Practicality
Super Carry
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Which One's Right for You?
Eeco
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Super Carry
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Eeco | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current Uganda-market generation | Current Uganda-market generation |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | Van | Pickup |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Light commercial vehicle | Light commercial vehicle |
| Vehicle Type | Light commercial vehicle | Pickup |
| Spec | Eeco | Super Carry |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 3675 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Width | 1475 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Height | 1825 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Wheelbase | 2350 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 160 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 150 mm | 150 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 32 l | 40 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 540 l | Not Applicable |
| Kerb Weight | 935 kg | 500 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1540 kg | 500 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 750 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 500 kg | 750 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Rows | 1 rows | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 4.5 m | 5.0 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | 1000 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
| Front Legroom | 1020 mm | 1020 mm |
| Rear Legroom | Not Applicable | Not Applicable |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Eeco and Super Carry comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Eeco 28 vs Super Carry 33.
Efficiency index: Eeco 61 vs Super Carry 59.
Safety-equipment index: Eeco 36 vs Super Carry 36.
Practicality index: Eeco 49 vs Super Carry 34.
Ownership-cover index: Eeco not separately scored vs Super Carry not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Eeco and Super Carry image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Suzuki Eeco
View 8 more Eeco images
Suzuki Super Carry
View 8 more Super Carry images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Eeco leads by 3 points
Eeco and Super Carry are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
42
/100
Lead
3
points
Data
78%
source coverage
42
#1
Evidence leader
Eeco
Performance
28
Efficiency
61
Safety
36
Practicality
49
Leads by 3 points
39
#2
Super Carry
Performance
33
Efficiency
59
Safety
36
Practicality
34
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Super Carry +5
Efficiency
Eeco +2
Safety
Level
Practicality
Eeco +15
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Eeco
Performance
28/100
Efficiency
61/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
49/100
Super Carry
Performance
33/100
Efficiency
59/100
Safety
36/100
Practicality
34/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Eeco leads. However, Super Carry may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Eeco vs Super Carry questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.