Source type: Hyundai Uganda / Motorcare quotation catalogue and model specifications
Hyundai Creta vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai Creta
CRETA 1.5L Petrol 4x2 CVT GL
Petrol
CVT
Current
UGX 190,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 84 kW
🔧 144 Nm
⛽ 15.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Land Cruiser 76
LC76 4.2L 5-MT 4x4
Diesel
5-Speed Manual
Current
UGX 355,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 96 kW
🔧 285 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Hyundai Creta vs Toyota Land Cruiser 76: the short answer
Land Cruiser 76 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Creta remains close.
Creta starts UGX 165,000,000 cheaper
Creta from UGX 190,000,000 · Land Cruiser 76 from UGX 355,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Creta | Land Cruiser 76 |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Creta84.4 kW @ 6300 rpm | Land Cruiser 7696 kW @ 3800 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Creta143.8 Nm @ 4500 rpm | Land Cruiser 76285 Nm @ 2200 rpm |
| Engine Size | Creta1497 cc | Land Cruiser 764164 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Creta15.0 km/l | Land Cruiser 7612.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Creta190 mm | Land Cruiser 76230 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Creta
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Land Cruiser 76
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Creta
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Land Cruiser 76
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Creta | Land Cruiser 76 |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Generation | Current market generation | Uganda-listed LC76 70 Series wagon with the 4.2-litre 1HZ diesel and five-speed manual. |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | Passenger/utility vehicle |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | SUV | Heavy-duty 4x4 wagon |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Utility wagon |
| Spec | Creta | Land Cruiser 76 |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4330 mm | 4720 mm |
| Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1955 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 190 mm | 230 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 160 mm | 220 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 l | 130 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 1000 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 2245 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | Not Officially Disclosed | 3060 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | 800 kg |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 3500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.5 m | 6.3 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1030 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 880 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Creta and Land Cruiser 76 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Creta 35 vs Land Cruiser 76 51.
Efficiency index: Creta 60 vs Land Cruiser 76 54.
Safety-equipment index: Creta 65 vs Land Cruiser 76 44.
Practicality index: Creta 55 vs Land Cruiser 76 95.
Ownership-cover index: Creta not separately scored vs Land Cruiser 76 not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Creta and Land Cruiser 76 image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai Creta
View 8 more Creta images
Toyota Land Cruiser 76
View 8 more Land Cruiser 76 images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Land Cruiser 76 leads by 8 points
Land Cruiser 76 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Creta remains close.
Evidence leader
61
/100
Lead
8
points
Data
74%
source coverage
61
#1
Evidence leader
Land Cruiser 76
Performance
51
Efficiency
54
Safety
44
Practicality
95
Leads by 8 points
53
#2
Creta
Performance
35
Efficiency
60
Safety
65
Practicality
55
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Land Cruiser 76 +16
Efficiency
Creta +6
Safety
Creta +21
Practicality
Land Cruiser 76 +40
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Land Cruiser 76
Performance
51/100
Efficiency
54/100
Safety
44/100
Practicality
95/100
Creta
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
60/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
55/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Land Cruiser 76 leads. However, Creta may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Creta vs Land Cruiser 76 questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.