Nissan NP300 Hardbody vs Ford Puma

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
VS
Ford Puma in South Africa

Ford Puma

1.0T EcoBoost ST-Line Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 459,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 92 kW 🔧 170 Nm ⛽ 16.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance NP300 Hardbody
Fuel Economy Puma
🛡 Safety Puma
📦 Practicality Puma
🔑 Ownership Tie
NP300 Hardbody starts ZAR 389900 cheaper NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900 · Puma from ZAR 389,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec NP300 Hardbody Puma
Engine Power 98 92
Torque 304 170
Engine Size 2488 999
Claimed Mileage 11.4 16.4
Ground Clearance 215 170
Boot Space Not Applicable 456
Airbags 4 8
Kerb Weight 1395 1325
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Puma

61
/ 100
+12
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Puma has a slight advantage, but NP300 Hardbody remains highly competitive.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance NP300 Hardbody +2 pts
Efficiency Puma +2 pts
Safety Puma +8 pts
Practicality Puma +4 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Performance 8/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Highway Driving
🏆 Overall Winner

Puma

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

NP300 Hardbody

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power

Puma

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec NP300 Hardbody Puma
Ground Clearance 215 170
Wheelbase 2500 2594
Length 4875 4186
Width 1760 1805
Height 1655 1531
Kerb Weight 1395 1325
Gross Vehicle Weight 2400 1775
Seating Capacity 5 5
Boot Space Not Applicable 456
Towing Capacity 2500 1200
Front Track Width 1495 1541
Rear Track Width 1490 1534
Turning Radius 5.8 5.4
Load Bed Length 1907 Available
Load Bed Width 1454 Available
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec NP300 Hardbody Puma
Engine 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel 1.0L EcoBoost Mild Hybrid
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged Inline 3 Cylinder Turbo Mild Hybrid
Displacement 2488 999
Cylinders 4 3
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 98 92
Power @ RPM 3600 rpm 6000 rpm
Torque 304 170
Torque @ RPM 1750-2500 rpm 2000-4500 rpm
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Turbocharger Single Turbo Single Turbo
Top Speed 168 185
0-100 km/h 12.5 10.5
Compression Ratio 17.5:1 10.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Transverse
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Puma wins with 61 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Puma emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Puma edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: NP300 Hardbody 7 vs Puma 9. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: NP300 Hardbody 12, Puma 20. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: NP300 Hardbody 12, Puma 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: NP300 Hardbody 8, Puma 12. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: NP300 Hardbody 10, Puma 8. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Puma edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Puma scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between NP300 Hardbody and Puma in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP300 Hardbody scores 10 vs 8.

Efficiency: NP300 Hardbody scores 7 vs 9.

Safety: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 20.

Practicality: NP300 Hardbody scores 8 vs 12.

Ownership: NP300 Hardbody scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Puma the advantage in this comparison.