Ford Mustang vs Nissan NP300 Hardbody

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Ford Mustang in South Africa

Ford Mustang

5.0 GT Premium Convertible Automatic Petrol Automatic
ZAR 1,449,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 338 kW 🔧 515 Nm ⛽ 9.1 km/l
VS
Nissan NP300 Hardbody in South Africa

Nissan NP300 Hardbody

2.5 TDi Double Cab Hi-Rider 4x4 Automatic Diesel Automatic
ZAR 529,900 ex-showroom
⚡ 98 kW 🔧 304 Nm ⛽ 11.4 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Mustang
Fuel Economy NP300 Hardbody
🛡 Safety Mustang
📦 Practicality Mustang
🔑 Ownership Tie
NP300 Hardbody starts ZAR 989900 cheaper Mustang from ZAR 989,900 · NP300 Hardbody from ZAR 349,900

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec Mustang NP300 Hardbody
Engine Power 338 98
Torque 515 304
Engine Size 4951 2488
Claimed Mileage 9.1 11.4
Ground Clearance 134 215
Boot Space 408 Not Applicable
Airbags 8 4
Kerb Weight 1815 1395
Seating Capacity Available Available
Warranty 3 3

= leads in this spec

The Overall Score — Here's How They Stack Up

🏆 Winner
#1

Mustang

67
/ 100
+18
pts
#2

NP300 Hardbody

49
/ 100

Moderate difference between the models.

The Bottom Line

Mustang holds a noticeable edge over NP300 Hardbody, especially in key ownership areas.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Mustang +10 pts
Efficiency NP300 Hardbody +2 pts
Safety Mustang +8 pts
Practicality Mustang +2 pts
Ownership Equal

Score Breakdown by Category

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Performance 20/20
Efficiency 5/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 10/20
Ownership 12/20

NP300 Hardbody

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 7/20
Safety 12/20
Practicality 8/20
Ownership 12/20

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

🏆 Overall Winner

Mustang

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to: Highway Driving Family Usage

NP300 Hardbody

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
Best suited to: Fuel Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

Mustang

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability

NP300 Hardbody

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Mustang NP300 Hardbody
Ground Clearance 134 215
Wheelbase 2720 2500
Length 4788 4875
Width 1916 1760
Height 1381 1655
Kerb Weight 1815 1395
Gross Vehicle Weight 2245 2400
Seating Capacity 4 5
Boot Space 408 Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not Rated 2500
Front Track Width 1617 1495
Rear Track Width 1607 1490
Turning Radius 6.1 5.8
Number of Doors 5 5
Boot Space Seats Folded 1500 1500
Load Bed Length Available 1907
Load Bed Width Available 1454
Front Legroom Available Available
Rear Legroom Available Available
Front Headroom Available Available
Rear Headroom Available Available
Front Shoulder Room Available Available
Rear Shoulder Room Available Available
Max Payload Available Available
Boot Volume Available Available
Doors Available Available
Seats Available Available
Front Overhang Available Available
Fuel Tank Capacity Available Available
Rear Overhang Available Available
Spec Mustang NP300 Hardbody
Engine 5.0L Coyote V8 Petrol 2.5L Turbocharged Diesel
Engine Type V8 DOHC Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Cylinder Turbocharged
Displacement 4951 2488
Cylinders 8 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 338 98
Power @ RPM 7300 rpm 3600 rpm
Torque 515 304
Torque @ RPM 4250 rpm 1750-2500 rpm
Fuel System Direct Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Turbocharger Not Available Single Turbo
Top Speed 250 168
0-100 km/h 4.6 12.5
Compression Ratio 12.0:1 17.5:1
Engine Position Front Longitudinal Front Longitudinal
Cylinder Layout Inline 4 (I4) Inline 4 (I4)
Engine Aspiration Turbocharged Turbocharged
Engine Code Standard Standard
Cylinder Bore 82.0 82.0
Piston Stroke 92.0 92.0
Fuel Grade Required Petrol Petrol
Engine Oil Capacity Available Available
Power 150 150
Variable Valve Timing Available Available
Maximum Engine RPM Available Available
Engine Type Config Available Available
0–100 km/h Available Available
Battery Capacity Available Available
Charging Port Available Available
AC Charging Time Available Available
Engine Displacement Available Available
EV Range Available Available

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Mustang wins with 67 pts vs 49 pts for NP300 Hardbody

In structured scoring, Mustang emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP300 Hardbody may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Mustang edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: Mustang 5 vs NP300 Hardbody 7. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: Mustang 20, NP300 Hardbody 12. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: Mustang 12, NP300 Hardbody 12. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: Mustang 10, NP300 Hardbody 8. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: Mustang 20, NP300 Hardbody 10. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Mustang edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Mustang scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between Mustang and NP300 Hardbody in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Mustang scores 20 vs 10.

Efficiency: Mustang scores 5 vs 7.

Safety: Mustang scores 20 vs 12.

Practicality: Mustang scores 10 vs 8.

Ownership: Mustang scores 12 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives Mustang the advantage in this comparison.