Nissan NP200 vs Ford Ranger Wildtrak

A proper head-to-head in South Africa — we cover price, performance, petrol economy, safety and what it'll actually cost you to own each one long term.

Includes an archived model

Current and archived cars are compared side by side. Archived models keep their verified historical specs, while price labels show last-listed context rather than current new-car availability.

Nissan NP200
Nissan NP200 in South Africa

Nissan NP200

1.6 Safety Pack Manual Petrol Manual Archive reference
ZAR 284,900 last listed
No longer sold new Specs stay visible for owner and used-car comparisons.
VS
Ford Ranger Wildtrak in South Africa

Ford Ranger Wildtrak

3.0TD V6 Double Cab Wildtrak 10AT 4x4 Diesel Automatic
ZAR 1,070,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 184 kW 🔧 600 Nm ⛽ 11.9 km/l
Add a 3rd car

At a Glance — Who Wins What

Performance Ranger Wildtrak
Fuel Economy Ranger Wildtrak
🛡 Safety Ranger Wildtrak
📦 Practicality Ranger Wildtrak
🔑 Ownership Ranger Wildtrak
NP200 starts ZAR 865000 cheaper NP200 from ZAR 224,900 · Ranger Wildtrak from ZAR 865,000

Key Specs Side by Side

The specs that matter most — highlighted where one car leads.

Spec NP200 Ranger Wildtrak
Engine Power Not confirmed 184
Torque Not confirmed 600
Engine Size Not confirmed 2993
Claimed Mileage Not confirmed 11.9
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 237
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Airbags Not confirmed Dual front, front side, curtain and driver knee
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2386
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Warranty Not confirmed 4 years / 120 000 km

= leads in this spec

Archived models stay fully comparable. Verified specs remain visible; historical fields that were not source-confirmed are marked Not confirmed instead of being guessed.

The Bottom Line

Ranger Wildtrak dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Where They Actually Differ

Performance Ranger Wildtrak +41 pts
Efficiency Ranger Wildtrak +2 pts
Safety Ranger Wildtrak +56 pts
Practicality Ranger Wildtrak +35 pts
Ownership Ranger Wildtrak +4 pts

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

NP200

Strengths
  • Nothing stands out clearly here.
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best suited to: General Use
🏆 Overall Winner

Ranger Wildtrak

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Weak Spots
  • No obvious weak spots to flag.
Best suited to: Highway Driving Fuel Efficiency Family Usage

Which One's Right for You?

NP200

  • Buyers looking for a balanced all-round vehicle

Ranger Wildtrak

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specs, Side by Side

Archived cars use verified historical spec records. Rows remain comparable; unavailable historical values are shown plainly rather than estimated.

Spec NP200 Ranger Wildtrak
Model Introduced Year Not confirmed Current local generation year not confirmed
Generation Not confirmed Current South African Ranger Wildtrak listing; generation notes should be kept tied to the local model year and confirmed derivative data.
Facelift History Not confirmed Model-year updates can affect trim, wheels, screens, safety equipment and colours. Use the latest South African price list when checking a specific vehicle.
Facelift Launched Since Not confirmed Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Not confirmed Current
Body Style Not confirmed Double Cab Pickup
Body Type Cab Not confirmed Single/extended/double cab as per derivative name
Color Note Not confirmed Colour availability changes by model year, production batch and dealer stock, check the current colour selector before ordering.
Dealer Stock Note Not confirmed Flagship grade in the South Africa lineup
Drivetrain Note Not confirmed Drive layout derived from the official derivative naming: 3.0TD V6 Double Cab Wildtrak 10AT 4x4
Model Year Not confirmed 2026
Production Status Not confirmed active
Segment Not confirmed Mid-size Bakkie
Vehicle Type Not confirmed Pickup
Spec NP200 Ranger Wildtrak
Ground Clearance Not confirmed 237 mm
Wheelbase Not confirmed 3270 mm
Length Not confirmed 5350 mm
Width Not confirmed 1918 mm
Height Not confirmed 1886 mm
Kerb Weight Not confirmed 2386 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight Not confirmed 3350 kg
Seating Capacity Not confirmed 5
Boot Space Not confirmed Not Applicable
Towing Capacity Not confirmed 3500 kg
Front Track Width Not confirmed 1620 mm
Rear Track Width Not confirmed 1620 mm
Turning Radius Not confirmed 12.9 m
Load Bed Length Not confirmed Not Applicable
Load Bed Width Not confirmed Not Applicable
Front Legroom Not confirmed 1057 mm
Rear Legroom Not confirmed 879 mm
Front Headroom Not confirmed 1024 mm
Rear Headroom Not confirmed 989 mm
Front Shoulder Room Not confirmed 1450 mm
Rear Shoulder Room Not confirmed 1440 mm
Boot Space Seats Folded Not confirmed Not Applicable
Number of Doors Not confirmed 4
Max Payload Not confirmed 964 kg
Boot Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Doors Not confirmed 4
Seats Not confirmed 5
Fuel Tank Capacity Not confirmed 80 l
Gross Vehicle Mass Kg Not confirmed 3350 kg
Ground Clearance Max Not confirmed 237 mm
Ground Clearance Min Not confirmed 237 mm
Ground Clearance Mm Not confirmed 237 mm
Height Mm Not confirmed 1886 mm
Length Mm Not confirmed 5350 mm
Loadbox Length Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Loadbox Width Mm Not confirmed Not Applicable
Payload Kg Not confirmed 964 kg
Cargo Volume Not confirmed Not Applicable
Tare Mass Kg Not confirmed 2386 kg
Tracking System Not confirmed Vehicle locator via app
Turning Circle Not confirmed 12.9 m
Turning Circle M Not confirmed 12.9 m
Width Mm Not confirmed 1918 mm

Overall Verdict Score

Decision-grade view of the winner, score gap and category strengths.

Weighted / 100
Verdict readout

Ranger Wildtrak leads by 31 points

Ranger Wildtrak dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Winner 70 /100
Lead 31 points
Data 77% confidence
70
#1 Winner

Ranger Wildtrak

77% data confidence 2 strong categories
Best at Performance 91 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 91
Efficiency 52
Safety 56
Practicality 85
Ownership 54
Leads by 31 points
39
#2

NP200

11% data confidence 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 50 Check Safety 0
Performance 50
Efficiency 50
Safety 0
Practicality 50
Ownership 50
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Ranger Wildtrak +41 Efficiency Ranger Wildtrak +2 Safety Ranger Wildtrak +56 Practicality Ranger Wildtrak +35 Ownership Ranger Wildtrak +4

High confidence result.

Why this score View full breakdown
Overall Winner

Ranger Wildtrak

Performance 91/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 56/100
Practicality 85/100
Ownership 54/100

NP200

Performance 50/100
Efficiency 50/100
Safety 0/100
Practicality 50/100
Ownership 50/100

So, Which One Should You Buy?

🏆 Ford Ranger Wildtrak wins with 70 pts vs 39 pts for NP200

In structured scoring, Ranger Wildtrak emerges as the stronger overall package. However, NP200 may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

Buyers Also Looked At These

Other comparisons that people in the same boat tend to check out.

Questions Buyers Usually Ask

On our scoring the Ranger Wildtrak edges ahead overall. That said, the right choice depends on what you actually use the car for — the breakdown above shows exactly where each one wins and loses.

Efficiency scores: NP200 50 vs Ranger Wildtrak 52. In the real world, diesel variants of either car will beat the claimed figure on long highways and fall short in Joburg traffic.

Safety scores: NP200 0, Ranger Wildtrak 56. Check each model page for NCAP ratings and which trim levels include AEB and blind-spot monitoring — those features aren't always standard.

Long-term ownership scores: NP200 50, Ranger Wildtrak 54. Service intervals, parts availability in SA, and whether a service plan is bundled all factor in — check the individual variant specs for that detail.

Practicality scores: NP200 50, Ranger Wildtrak 85. This covers boot space, seat flexibility, and day-to-day usability — not just interior dimensions on paper.

Performance scores: NP200 50, Ranger Wildtrak 91. This looks at real-world pace — 0–100 kph, highway flexibility, and how either car feels when you actually need to overtake on an N-road.

Resale varies with colour, spec, and market timing, but Japanese brands — and Toyota specifically — have a strong track record in SA. Check current used prices for both on AutoTrader to see the real gap right now.

Ground clearance and 4WD availability are what matter most here. Scroll to the spec table above to compare both side by side — if either model offers a 4WD variant, that's the version worth comparing.

Fuel, insurance, and service costs are the big three. Diesel variants of both models typically save R800–R1,500/month in fuel at current SA pump prices. The Ranger Wildtrak edges the overall ownership score, but check whether either variant includes a service plan — that changes the monthly maths significantly.

The Ranger Wildtrak scores better overall, but neither car is a bad buy here. It comes down to what features matter to you — check the full spec table above to see exactly what you gain and lose at each price point.

In Depth — Breaking It All Down

The comparison between NP200 and Ranger Wildtrak in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: NP200 scores 50 vs 91.

Efficiency: NP200 scores 50 vs 52.

Safety: NP200 scores 0 vs 56.

Practicality: NP200 scores 50 vs 85.

Ownership: NP200 scores 50 vs 54.

Final structured scoring gives Ranger Wildtrak the advantage in this comparison.