Isuzu MU-X vs Nissan Qashqai

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Isuzu MU-X in South Africa

Isuzu MU-X

ZAR 670,000 – 820,000
⚡ 110 hp
🔧 350 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l
VS
Nissan Qashqai in South Africa

Nissan Qashqai

ZAR 495,000 – 545,000
⚡ 110 hp
🔧 250 Nm
⛽ 16.5 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance MU-X
Mileage Qashqai
🔑 Ownership MU-X

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

MU-X

73
out of 100
11
point lead
Moderate difference between the two models.

Qashqai

62
out of 100

Executive Summary

MU-X has a slight advantage, but Qashqai remains highly competitive.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance MU-X +2 pts
Efficiency Qashqai +1 pts
Safety MU-X +2 pts
Practicality Equal
Ownership MU-X +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Performance 12/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 20/20

Qashqai

Performance 10/20
Efficiency 9/20
Safety 18/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving

Qashqai

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency

Who Should Buy Which?

MU-X

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Qashqai

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

Full Specification Comparison

Specification MU-X Qashqai
Ground Clearance 230 180
Wheelbase 2855 2665
Length 4850 4425
Width 1870 1835
Height 1825 1625
Kerb Weight 1950 1420
Gross Vehicle Weight 2800 1950
Seating Capacity 7 5
Boot Space 311 504
Towing Capacity 3000 1500
Specification MU-X Qashqai
Engine 1.9L Ddi Turbo Diesel 1.3L Turbocharged Petrol
Engine Type Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled Inline 4 Turbo
Displacement 1898 1332
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 110 110
Torque 350 250
Fuel System Common Rail Direct Injection Direct Injection
Top Speed 175 198
0-100 km/h 11.8 9.2

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu MU-X wins this comparison with 73 points vs 62 points for Qashqai.

In structured scoring, MU-X emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Qashqai may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, MU-X performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

MU-X scores 8 while Qashqai scores 9 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, MU-X scores 20 and Qashqai scores 18. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

MU-X scores 20 versus Qashqai scoring 12. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives MU-X 13 and Qashqai 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows MU-X scoring 12 compared to Qashqai scoring 10, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest MU-X may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. MU-X performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives MU-X the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between MU-X and Qashqai in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: MU-X scores 12 vs 10.

Efficiency: MU-X scores 8 vs 9.

Safety: MU-X scores 20 vs 18.

Practicality: MU-X scores 13 vs 13.

Ownership: MU-X scores 20 vs 12.

Final structured scoring gives MU-X the advantage in this comparison.