Honda Amaze vs Isuzu MU-X

In-depth comparison in South Africa covering price, performance, fuel efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership costs.

Honda Amaze in South Africa

Honda Amaze

ZAR 254,900 – 289,900
⚡ 66 hp
🔧 110 Nm
⛽ 18.2 km/l
VS
Isuzu MU-X in South Africa

Isuzu MU-X

ZAR 670,000 – 820,000
⚡ 110 hp
🔧 350 Nm
⛽ 14.0 km/l

Quick Winners

Performance MU-X
Mileage Amaze
🔑 Ownership MU-X

Overall Comparison Score

🏆 Winner

MU-X

73
out of 100
27
point lead
High confidence result.

Amaze

46
out of 100

Executive Summary

MU-X dominates this comparison with clear advantages across multiple categories.

Key Differences At A Glance

Performance MU-X +7 pts
Efficiency Amaze +3 pts
Safety MU-X +14 pts
Practicality MU-X +1 pts
Ownership MU-X +8 pts

Category Score Breakdown

🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Performance 12/20
Efficiency 8/20
Safety 20/20
Practicality 13/20
Ownership 20/20

Amaze

Performance 5/20
Efficiency 11/20
Safety 6/20
Practicality 12/20
Ownership 12/20

Pros & Cons

Amaze

Pros
  • Better fuel efficiency
Cons
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Less comprehensive safety features
  • Less practical in daily usage
  • Shorter warranty coverage
Best For: Fuel Efficiency
🏆 Overall Winner

MU-X

Pros
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger safety package
  • More practical for daily use
  • Better long-term ownership value
Cons
  • Lower fuel efficiency
Best For: Highway Driving Family Usage

Who Should Buy Which?

Amaze

  • Buyers looking for better fuel efficiency

MU-X

  • Drivers who prioritise strong highway performance and overtaking power
  • Families prioritising stronger safety equipment
  • Large families needing more practicality and usability
  • Long-term owners valuing warranty and ownership peace of mind

Full Specification Comparison

Specification Amaze MU-X
Ground Clearance 170 230
Wheelbase 2470 2855
Length 3995 4850
Width 1695 1870
Height 1498 1825
Kerb Weight 980 1950
Gross Vehicle Weight 1420 2800
Seating Capacity 5 7
Boot Space 420 311
Towing Capacity 900 3000
Specification Amaze MU-X
Engine 1.2L i-VTEC Petrol 1.9L Ddi Turbo Diesel
Engine Type Inline 4 Cylinder Naturally Aspirated Inline 4 Turbocharged Intercooled
Displacement 1199 1898
Cylinders 4 4
Valves per Cylinder 4 4
Power 66 110
Torque 110 350
Fuel System Multi-Point Fuel Injection Common Rail Direct Injection
Top Speed 170 175
0-100 km/h 14.5 11.8

Final Verdict

🏆 Isuzu MU-X wins this comparison with 73 points vs 46 points for Amaze.

In structured scoring, MU-X emerges as the stronger overall package. However, Amaze may appeal to buyers prioritising different factors. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in South Africa.

People Also Compare

Popular comparisons among buyers considering similar options.

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on structured category scoring, MU-X performs better overall in South Africa. However, final choice depends on driving priorities.

Amaze scores 11 while MU-X scores 8 in efficiency. Real-world mileage may vary based on driving conditions.

In safety scoring, Amaze scores 6 and MU-X scores 20. Both offer competitive safety packages in this segment.

Amaze scores 12 versus MU-X scoring 20. Warranty coverage and ownership value influence this result.

Practicality scoring gives Amaze 12 and MU-X 13, reflecting cabin space and usability.

Performance category shows Amaze scoring 5 compared to MU-X scoring 12, indicating stronger overtaking capability.

While resale depends on market demand, ownership and brand positioning suggest MU-X may hold stronger long-term value.

Off-road suitability depends on drivetrain and ground clearance. Refer to the full specification comparison for detailed technical differences.

Efficiency and ownership categories influence running costs. MU-X performs slightly stronger overall in structured scoring.

Value depends on feature set, performance and ownership coverage. Structured comparison gives MU-X the overall advantage.

Detailed Comparison Analysis

The comparison between Amaze and MU-X in South Africa evaluates performance, efficiency, safety, practicality and long-term ownership value.

Performance: Amaze scores 5 vs 12.

Efficiency: Amaze scores 11 vs 8.

Safety: Amaze scores 6 vs 20.

Practicality: Amaze scores 12 vs 13.

Ownership: Amaze scores 12 vs 20.

Final structured scoring gives MU-X the advantage in this comparison.