Suzuki Jimny vs Suzuki New Swift

A proper head-to-head in Kenya — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Suzuki Jimny in Kenya

Suzuki Jimny

Jimny 3D MC25 5MT 4WD GL DA2 audio Petrol 5-Speed Manual Current
KES 3,950,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 75 kW 🔧 130 Nm
VS
Suzuki New Swift in Kenya

Suzuki New Swift

SWIFT GL+ 5D 1197p CVT Petrol CVT Current
KES 2,850,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 60 kW 🔧 112 Nm
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Suzuki Jimny vs Suzuki New Swift: the short answer

Jimny and New Swift are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

New Swift starts KES 1,100,000 cheaper Jimny from KES 3,950,000 · New Swift from KES 2,850,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Jimny New Swift
Maximum Power Jimny75 kW @ 6000 rpm New Swift60 kW
Maximum Torque Jimny130 Nm @ 4000 rpm New Swift111.7 Nm @ 4300 rpm
Engine Size Jimny1462 cc New Swift1197 cc
Combined Fuel Economy JimnyNot Officially Disclosed New SwiftNot Officially Disclosed
Ground Clearance Jimny210 mm New Swift145 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

Evidence for Suzuki Jimny Jimny 3D MC25 5MT 4WD GL DA2 audio

Source type: Suzuki Kenya

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Jimny

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance
Specification evidence leader

New Swift

Strengths
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Jimny

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

New Swift

  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Jimny New Swift
Model Introduced Year Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Generation Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift History Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Launched Since Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Facelift Version Ending Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Body Style SUV Compacts
Model Year Not Officially Disclosed 2026
Production Status Active active
Segment Kenya-market SUV Compact hatchback
Vehicle Type SUV Hatchback
Spec Jimny New Swift
Length 3645 mm 3860 mm
Width 1645 mm 1735 mm
Height 1725 mm 1520 mm
Wheelbase 2250 mm 2450 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 210 mm 145 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 195 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 l 37 l
Boot/Cargo Space 85 l 265 l
Kerb Weight 1090 kg 960 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1435 kg 1390 kg
Payload Capacity 340 kg 430 kg
Towing Capacity 1300 kg 1000 kg
Seating Capacity 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.9 m 4.8 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This Jimny and New Swift comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Kenya. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Jimny 39 vs New Swift 29.

Efficiency index: Jimny 53 vs New Swift 67.

Safety-equipment index: Jimny 83 vs New Swift 82.

Practicality index: Jimny 44 vs New Swift 49.

Ownership-cover index: Jimny not separately scored vs New Swift not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

New Swift leads by 1 points

Jimny and New Swift are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 55 /100
Lead 1 points
Data 68% source coverage
55
#1 Evidence leader

New Swift

68% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 82 Check Performance 29
Performance 29
Efficiency 67
Safety 82
Practicality 49
Leads by 1 points
54
#2

Jimny

68% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 83 Check Performance 39
Performance 39
Efficiency 53
Safety 83
Practicality 44
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Jimny +10 Efficiency New Swift +14 Safety Jimny +1 Practicality New Swift +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

New Swift

Performance 29/100
Efficiency 67/100
Safety 82/100
Practicality 49/100

Jimny

Performance 39/100
Efficiency 53/100
Safety 83/100
Practicality 44/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Suzuki New Swift leads the specification evidence index with 55 pts vs 54 pts for Jimny

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, New Swift leads. However, Jimny may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Kenya.

Jimny vs New Swift questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Kenya on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.