Toyota Starlet Cross vs Hyundai Tucson

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Toyota Starlet Cross in Uganda

Toyota Starlet Cross

1.5L Petrol AT DELUXE Petrol 4-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 116,900,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW 🔧 138 Nm ⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Hyundai Tucson in Uganda

Hyundai Tucson

TUCSON 2.0L Diesel 4x4 8AT GL Diesel 8-Speed Automatic Current
UGX 200,000,000 ex-showroom
🔧 416 Nm ⛽ 13.0 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Toyota Starlet Cross vs Hyundai Tucson: the short answer

Starlet Cross and Tucson are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Starlet Cross starts UGX 100,900,000 cheaper Starlet Cross from UGX 99,100,000 · Tucson from UGX 200,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification Starlet Cross Tucson
Maximum Power Starlet Cross77 kW @ 6000 rpm TucsonNot Officially Disclosed
Maximum Torque Starlet Cross138 Nm @ 4400 rpm Tucson416 Nm @ 2000-2750 rpm
Engine Size Starlet Cross1462 cc Tucson1998 cc
Combined Fuel Economy Starlet Cross12.5 km/l Tucson13.0 km/l
Ground Clearance Starlet Cross190 mm Tucson181 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

Starlet Cross

Strengths
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: General Use
Specification evidence leader

Tucson

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency Published Practicality

Which One's Right for You?

Starlet Cross

  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Tucson

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec Starlet Cross Tucson
Model Introduced Year 2024 2023
Generation Current Uganda listing; local generation dates are not stated. Current market generation
Facelift History No local facelift confirmed Current-generation specification
Facelift Launched Since Original current-generation version 2023
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Hatchback SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Compact crossover SUV
Vehicle Type Passenger crossover Passenger SUV
Spec Starlet Cross Tucson
Length 3995 mm 4630 mm
Width 1765 mm 1865 mm
Height 1550 mm 1665 mm
Wheelbase 2520 mm 2755 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 190 mm 181 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) 155 mm 160 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 37 l 54 l
Boot/Cargo Space 304 l Not Officially Disclosed
Kerb Weight 1010 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 1480 kg Not Officially Disclosed
Payload Capacity Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Towing Capacity 1000 kg 1500 kg
Seating Capacity 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 2 rows 2 rows
Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 4.8 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom Not Officially Disclosed 1000 mm
Rear Headroom Not Officially Disclosed Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 1030 mm
Rear Legroom Not Officially Disclosed 880 mm

In depth: how these cars differ

This Starlet Cross and Tucson comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: Starlet Cross 35 vs Tucson 62.

Efficiency index: Starlet Cross 52 vs Tucson 55.

Safety-equipment index: Starlet Cross 85 vs Tucson 61.

Practicality index: Starlet Cross 55 vs Tucson 60.

Ownership-cover index: Starlet Cross not separately scored vs Tucson not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

Tucson leads by 3 points

Starlet Cross and Tucson are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.

Evidence leader 60 /100
Lead 3 points
Data 60% source coverage
60
#1 Evidence leader

Tucson

60% source coverage 0 strong categories
Best at Performance 62 Check Efficiency 55
Performance 62
Efficiency 55
Safety 61
Practicality 60
Leads by 3 points
57
#2

Starlet Cross

71% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 85 Check Performance 35
Performance 35
Efficiency 52
Safety 85
Practicality 55
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance Tucson +27 Efficiency Tucson +3 Safety Starlet Cross +24 Practicality Tucson +5

Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

Tucson

Performance 62/100
Efficiency 55/100
Safety 61/100
Practicality 60/100

Starlet Cross

Performance 35/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 85/100
Practicality 55/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Hyundai Tucson leads the specification evidence index with 60 pts vs 57 pts for Starlet Cross

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Tucson leads. However, Starlet Cross may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

Starlet Cross vs Tucson questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.