Source type: Hyundai Uganda / Motorcare quotation catalogue and model specifications
Hyundai Creta vs Toyota Starlet Cross
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Hyundai Creta
CRETA 1.5L Petrol 4x2 CVT GL
Petrol
CVT
Current
UGX 190,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 84 kW
🔧 144 Nm
⛽ 15.0 km/l
VS
Toyota Starlet Cross
1.5L Petrol AT DELUXE
Petrol
4-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 116,900,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
Decision summary
Hyundai Creta vs Toyota Starlet Cross: the short answer
Creta and Starlet Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Starlet Cross starts UGX 90,900,000 cheaper
Creta from UGX 190,000,000 · Starlet Cross from UGX 99,100,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Creta | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Creta84.4 kW @ 6300 rpm | Starlet Cross77 kW @ 6000 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Creta143.8 Nm @ 4500 rpm | Starlet Cross138 Nm @ 4400 rpm |
| Engine Size | Creta1497 cc | Starlet Cross1462 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Creta15.0 km/l | Starlet Cross12.5 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Creta190 mm | Starlet Cross190 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Creta
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Starlet Cross
Strengths
- Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
General Use
Which One's Right for You?
Creta
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Starlet Cross
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Creta | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2023 | 2024 |
| Generation | Current market generation | Current Uganda listing; local generation dates are not stated. |
| Facelift History | Current-generation specification | No local facelift confirmed |
| Facelift Launched Since | 2023 | Original current-generation version |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | SUV | Hatchback |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | SUV | Compact crossover |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger SUV | Passenger crossover |
| Spec | Creta | Starlet Cross |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4330 mm | 3995 mm |
| Width | 1790 mm | 1765 mm |
| Height | 1635 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2610 mm | 2520 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 190 mm | 190 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 160 mm | 155 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 l | 37 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | Not Officially Disclosed | 304 l |
| Kerb Weight | Not Officially Disclosed | 1010 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | Not Officially Disclosed | 1480 kg |
| Payload Capacity | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1000 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Rows | 2 rows | 2 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.5 m | 4.8 m |
| Front Headroom | 1000 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Front Legroom | 1030 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Rear Legroom | 880 mm | Not Officially Disclosed |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Creta and Starlet Cross comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Creta 35 vs Starlet Cross 35.
Efficiency index: Creta 60 vs Starlet Cross 52.
Safety-equipment index: Creta 65 vs Starlet Cross 85.
Practicality index: Creta 55 vs Starlet Cross 55.
Ownership-cover index: Creta not separately scored vs Starlet Cross not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Creta and Starlet Cross image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Hyundai Creta
View 8 more Creta images
Toyota Starlet Cross
View 8 more Starlet Cross images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Starlet Cross leads by 4 points
Creta and Starlet Cross are close on the comparable published fields, so buyer priorities should decide.
Evidence leader
57
/100
Lead
4
points
Data
71%
source coverage
57
#1
Evidence leader
Starlet Cross
Performance
35
Efficiency
52
Safety
85
Practicality
55
Leads by 4 points
53
#2
Creta
Performance
35
Efficiency
60
Safety
65
Practicality
55
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Level
Efficiency
Creta +8
Safety
Starlet Cross +20
Practicality
Level
Close catalogue match. Buyer priorities should decide the outcome.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Starlet Cross
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
85/100
Practicality
55/100
Creta
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
60/100
Safety
65/100
Practicality
55/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Starlet Cross leads. However, Creta may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Creta vs Starlet Cross questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.