Source type: Toyota Uganda/CFAO specifications; user-supplied estimates for remaining fields
Toyota Rumion vs Hyundai Santa Fe
A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.
Toyota Rumion
Rumion 1.5L Petrol 4AT DELUXE
Petrol
4-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 118,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 77 kW
🔧 138 Nm
⛽ 12.5 km/l
VS
Hyundai Santa Fe
SANTA FE 2.5L Petrol 4x4 8AT GLS
Petrol
8-Speed Automatic
Current
UGX 210,000,000
ex-showroom
⚡ 143 kW
🔧 246 Nm
⛽ 11.76 km/l
Decision summary
Toyota Rumion vs Hyundai Santa Fe: the short answer
Santa Fe has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Rumion remains close.
Rumion starts UGX 92,000,000 cheaper
Rumion from UGX 118,000,000 · Santa Fe from UGX 210,000,000
Five key differences
Exact selected derivatives| Specification | Rumion | Santa Fe |
|---|---|---|
| Maximum Power | Rumion77 kW @ 6000 rpm | Santa Fe142.7 kW @ 6100 rpm |
| Maximum Torque | Rumion138 Nm @ 4400 rpm | Santa Fe246 Nm @ 4000 rpm |
| Engine Size | Rumion1462 cc | Santa Fe2497 cc |
| Combined Fuel Economy | Rumion12.5 km/l | Santa Fe11.76 km/l |
| Ground Clearance | Rumion180 mm | Santa Fe177 mm |
Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.
Source type: Hyundai Uganda / Motorcare quotation catalogue and model specifications
What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)
Rumion
Strengths
- Better fuel efficiency
Weak Spots
- Less powerful engine setup
- Fewer listed safety features
- Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to:
Published Efficiency
Specification evidence leader
Santa Fe
Strengths
- More powerful engine output
- Stronger listed safety equipment
- Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
- Lower fuel efficiency
Best suited to:
Published Performance
Published Practicality
Which One's Right for You?
Rumion
- Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
Santa Fe
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
- Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment
- Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures
Full Specs, Side by Side
| Spec | Rumion | Santa Fe |
|---|---|---|
| Model Introduced Year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Generation | Seven-seat Rumion MPV introduced in Uganda in November 2022 | Current market generation |
| Facelift History | No local facelift confirmed | Current-generation specification |
| Facelift Launched Since | Original current-generation version | 2023 |
| Facelift Version Ending | Current | Current |
| Body Style | MPV | SUV |
| Model Year | 2026 | 2026 |
| Production Status | active | active |
| Segment | Seven-seat compact MPV | SUV |
| Vehicle Type | Passenger MPV | Passenger SUV |
| Spec | Rumion | Santa Fe |
|---|---|---|
| Length | 4395 mm | 4830 mm |
| Width | 1735 mm | 1900 mm |
| Height | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2740 mm | 2815 mm |
| Ground Clearance (Default) | 180 mm | 177 mm |
| Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) | 170 mm | 160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 l | 67 l |
| Boot/Cargo Space | 153 l | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Kerb Weight | 1160 kg | 1970 kg |
| Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) | 1730 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Payload Capacity | 580 kg | Not Officially Disclosed |
| Towing Capacity | 750 kg | 1500 kg |
| Seating Capacity | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Rows | 3 rows | 3 rows |
| Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Minimum Turning Radius | 5.2 m | 5.5 m |
| Front Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1020 mm |
| Rear Headroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1007 mm |
| Front Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1052 mm |
| Rear Legroom | Not Officially Disclosed | 1075 mm |
In depth: how these cars differ
This Rumion and Santa Fe comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.
Performance index: Rumion 35 vs Santa Fe 56.
Efficiency index: Rumion 52 vs Santa Fe 46.
Safety-equipment index: Rumion 50 vs Santa Fe 63.
Practicality index: Rumion 54 vs Santa Fe 70.
Ownership-cover index: Rumion not separately scored vs Santa Fe not separately scored.
These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.
Model imagery
Rumion and Santa Fe image comparison
Open an image for its full canonical file or visit the model page for the complete vehicle record.
Toyota Rumion
View 8 more Rumion images
Hyundai Santa Fe
View 8 more Santa Fe images
Specification Evidence Index
A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.
Evidence-index readout
Santa Fe leads by 12 points
Santa Fe has a modest catalogue-index lead, while Rumion remains close.
Evidence leader
59
/100
Lead
12
points
Data
71%
source coverage
59
#1
Evidence leader
Santa Fe
Performance
56
Efficiency
46
Safety
63
Practicality
70
Leads by 12 points
47
#2
Rumion
Performance
35
Efficiency
52
Safety
50
Practicality
54
Performance 24%
Safety 22%
Practicality 22%
Efficiency 17%
Ownership 15%
Category leaders
What moves the verdict
Performance
Santa Fe +21
Efficiency
Rumion +6
Safety
Santa Fe +13
Practicality
Santa Fe +16
Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.
Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader
Santa Fe
Performance
56/100
Efficiency
46/100
Safety
63/100
Practicality
70/100
Rumion
Performance
35/100
Efficiency
52/100
Safety
50/100
Practicality
54/100
What the evidence means
In Hagalu's specification evidence index, Santa Fe leads. However, Rumion may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.
Related comparisons
Continue with closely related Uganda models and comparable body styles.
Rumion vs Santa Fe questions
There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.
Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.
Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.
A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.
Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.
Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.