Isuzu N-Series vs Toyota RAV4

A proper head-to-head in Uganda — compare price, performance, fuel economy or electric range, safety and the details that shape long-term ownership.

Isuzu N-Series in Uganda

Isuzu N-Series

NHR 55E Cab Chassis 5MT Diesel 5-Speed Manual Current
UGX 125,000,000 ex-showroom
⚡ 59 kW 🔧 175 Nm ⛽ 4.5 km/l
VS
Toyota RAV4 in Uganda

Toyota RAV4

2.0 Petrol CVT AWD Petrol CVT Current
UGX 210,000,000 ex-showroom
⛽ 12.5 km/l
+ Add a 3rd car

Decision summary

Isuzu N-Series vs Toyota RAV4: the short answer

RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while N-Series remains close.

N-Series starts UGX 85,000,000 cheaper N-Series from UGX 125,000,000 · RAV4 from UGX 210,000,000

Five key differences

Exact selected derivatives
Specification N-Series RAV4
Maximum Power N-Series59 kW @ 3600 rpm RAV4Not Officially Disclosed
Maximum Torque N-Series175 Nm @ 2000 rpm RAV4Not Officially Disclosed
Engine Size N-Series2771 cc RAV41987 cc
Combined Fuel Economy N-Series4.5 km/l RAV412.5 km/l
Ground Clearance N-Series180 mm RAV4190 mm

Strongest published figure in that row; no road-test winner is implied.

What Each Car Gets Right (and Wrong)

N-Series

Strengths
  • Stronger published practicality figures
Weak Spots
  • Less powerful engine setup
  • Lower fuel efficiency
  • Fewer listed safety features
Best suited to: Published Practicality
Specification evidence leader

RAV4

Strengths
  • More powerful engine output
  • Better fuel efficiency
  • Stronger listed safety equipment
Weak Spots
  • Lower published practicality figures
Best suited to: Published Performance Published Efficiency

Which One's Right for You?

N-Series

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published space and capacity figures

RAV4

  • Buyers prioritising the stronger published powertrain figures
  • Buyers prioritising the lower published fuel or energy use
  • Buyers prioritising the more complete listed safety equipment

Full Specs, Side by Side

Spec N-Series RAV4
Model Introduced Year 2022 2023
Generation N-Series truck cab-chassis specification in MAC Uganda-linked Isuzu East Africa brochure; finished body specified separately Uganda petrol RAV4 listing, kept separate from RAV4 HEV and used-import specifications. Exact supplied model year and equipment grade remain important.
Facelift History Current Uganda-listed generation; 2026 catalogue planning specification No local facelift confirmed
Facelift Launched Since 2024 Original current-generation version
Facelift Version Ending Current Current
Body Style Cab Chassis SUV
Model Year 2026 2026
Production Status active active
Segment Light-duty commercial truck Family SUV
Vehicle Type Commercial truck chassis Passenger SUV
Spec N-Series RAV4
Length 4590 mm 4600 mm
Width 1695 mm 1855 mm
Height 2095 mm 1685 mm
Wheelbase 2490 mm 2690 mm
Ground Clearance (Default) 180 mm 190 mm
Ground Clearance (With Full Seating Load) Not Officially Disclosed 175 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 l 55 l
Boot/Cargo Space Not Applicable 580 l
Kerb Weight Not Officially Disclosed 1570 kg
Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW) 7500 kg 2150 kg
Payload Capacity 4500 kg 580 kg
Towing Capacity 3500 kg 750 kg
Seating Capacity 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Rows 1 rows 2 rows
Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Minimum Turning Radius 6.1 m 5.5 m
Front Headroom 1030 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Headroom Not Applicable Not Officially Disclosed
Front Legroom 1020 mm Not Officially Disclosed
Rear Legroom Not Applicable Not Officially Disclosed

In depth: how these cars differ

This N-Series and RAV4 comparison uses the exact derivatives selected above for Uganda. The catalogue index covers performance, efficiency, safety equipment, practicality and ownership cover only where comparable source-backed fields are present.

Performance index: N-Series 29 vs RAV4 55.

Efficiency index: N-Series 26 vs RAV4 52.

Safety-equipment index: N-Series 89 vs RAV4 95.

Practicality index: N-Series 73 vs RAV4 65.

Ownership-cover index: N-Series not separately scored vs RAV4 not separately scored.

These figures are Hagalu catalogue-comparison indicators, not customer ratings, crash-test scores, resale guarantees or a substitute for a road test. Each page shows its weighted source coverage beside the result.

Specification Evidence Index

A transparent comparison of published catalogue fields. This is not a road-test score, owner rating or editorial review rating, and it appears only when every vehicle clears the same comparable-data threshold.

Evidence / 100
Evidence-index readout

RAV4 leads by 12 points

RAV4 has a modest catalogue-index lead, while N-Series remains close.

Evidence leader 67 /100
Lead 12 points
Data 57% source coverage
67
#1 Evidence leader

RAV4

57% source coverage 1 strong categories
Best at Safety 95 Check Efficiency 52
Performance 55
Efficiency 52
Safety 95
Practicality 65
Leads by 12 points
55
#2

N-Series

59% source coverage 2 strong categories
Best at Safety 89 Check Efficiency 26
Performance 29
Efficiency 26
Safety 89
Practicality 73
Performance 24% Safety 22% Practicality 22% Efficiency 17% Ownership 15%
Category leaders What moves the verdict
Performance RAV4 +26 Efficiency RAV4 +26 Safety RAV4 +6 Practicality N-Series +8

Moderate difference in the source-backed catalogue index.

Why this score View full breakdown
Evidence-index leader

RAV4

Performance 55/100
Efficiency 52/100
Safety 95/100
Practicality 65/100

N-Series

Performance 29/100
Efficiency 26/100
Safety 89/100
Practicality 73/100

What the evidence means

Evidence index Toyota RAV4 leads the specification evidence index with 67 pts vs 55 pts for N-Series

In Hagalu's specification evidence index, RAV4 leads. However, N-Series may suit buyers prioritising different confirmed fields. Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving priorities in Uganda.

N-Series vs RAV4 questions

There is no universal winner. Use the comparison table to match the models and available derivatives in Uganda on price, safety equipment, space, powertrain and ownership cover. The category indicators summarise published catalogue data; they are not a road test or customer rating.

Compare the published consumption or mileage rows for the exact derivatives using the same unit and test basis. A catalogue figure is useful for like-for-like comparison, but traffic, speed, load, weather and driving style can change actual fuel use.

Compare only equipment explicitly listed for each derivative, including airbags, stability control and driver-assistance systems. Confirm the exact trim with the manufacturer, and treat any independent crash-test result separately because equipment and ratings can differ by market.

A reliable five-year total cannot be calculated from catalogue data alone. Add the exact purchase and finance cost, fuel or electricity, insurance quotes, scheduled servicing, tyres and expected resale value. Check whether the selected derivative includes a service or maintenance plan.

Use the seating, boot or load-space, ISOFIX and safety rows as a first check. Then test the exact cars with your child seats, passengers and typical luggage, because published dimensions do not show every access or comfort difference.

Compare the published power, torque and 0–100 km/h rows when they are available for both exact derivatives. Vehicle weight, gearing and power delivery also matter, so catalogue outputs alone do not establish real-world overtaking or response.